Why was the icon of the Magpies not reopened?
According to Tejarat News, Majid Eshghi in a conversation with ISNAto the question of whether the reason for not opening the symbol Magentas It is the non-disclosure of the contracts of these two teams, he answered: One issue is the disclosure of the contracts and the other issue is the holding of extraordinary assemblies to amend the statutes. If this happens the symbols will be unlocked.
He continued: Two teams Esteghlal and Persepolis They must disclose the information that the exchange wants.
According to this report, the subscription of 1 billion 236 million 99 thousand 656 shares of new shares of Esteghlal Sports Company of Iran (common stock) in trading symbol (Estiqlalh 1) and 1 billion 34 million 840 thousand 567 shares From the new shares of Persepolis Cultural Sports Company (public shares) in the trading symbol (Perspolish 1) due to the revocation of the right of first refusal by the order registration method in the orange board of the base market of the Iranian exchange, it started on March 15th and finally ended on March 28th.
According to statistics, 320,000 people participated in Persepolis subscription. 261 billion Tomans of shares of this club were bought by legal entities and more than 88 billion Tomans were purchased by individuals. Also, 286,000 people participated in the subscription of Esteghlal, and 280 billion Tomans of this club’s shares were purchased by legal entities and 79 billion Tomans by individuals.
The contracts have not been revealed yet!?
Until now, various promises were made by the privatization organization regarding the reopening of the two clubs, but none of them were implemented.
Based on this, some time ago Hossein Gurbanzadeh, the head of the privatization organization, emphasized that Esteghlal and Persepolis should disclose the text of their contracts and announced that since the listing, these two clubs must disclose their major financial events on the Kodal Stock Exchange website. and provide the full text of all contracts to the over-the-counter company and the privatization organization in addition to specialized regulators such as the league organization and…
The follow-ups from the Farbours company regarding the reason for not reopening the symbols of the two mentioned teams did not result, but it seems that the problem of disclosing the contract by the two clubs still persists.