A year after the war that changed Tel Aviv’s security equations

According to Fars News Agency’s International Service, we are on the eve of the anniversary of the Zionist regime’s invasion of Gaza (known as the 12-Day War), a war that differed in all dimensions from all previous Palestinian battles and changed equations at the macro level.

In a report by the Palestinian writer and journalist Sharhbil al-Gharib, the Al-Mayadin website wrote an article on the effects of the 12-day war in Gaza on the security, military and social environment of occupied Palestine over the past year.

He wrote that a number of Israeli circles blocked the Talmudic ritual and the slaughter of the victim by extremist Zionist groups and then prevented them from holding a “flag march” near Bab al-Amoud in Al-Aqsa Mosque (June 10, 1400) for fear of tension. Again, they consider a military from Gaza and say that these issues are a victory for the Palestinian resistance and that it has been able to link the equations of Jerusalem and Gaza without launching a missile.

“Blocking the flag march in Jerusalem is a surrender to the Hamas movement and its threats, and the inability of the Israeli police inspector general to secure the march,” said Bezalel Smotrich, leader of the Israeli Religious Zionist Party. “The events of Yahya al-Sanwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, have turned him into the leader of Al-Quds affairs.”

“The Jerusalem scene, in addition to the shiny wall, which is almost empty of Jewish worshipers, shows a decisive victory for Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the war against Israel,” said Israeli journalist Yair Levy.

“Hamas gained a new victory after the ‘Guardian of the Walls’ (Sword of Al-Quds) war by creating a new equation and marching on flags,” said Galberger, a Palestinian affairs analyst on Israel’s public television channel Kan 11. “Barred him from entering the old part of Jerusalem.”

“One year after the battle of the Sword of Al-Quds, Hamas and its affiliates have achieved a dramatic victory and imposed new equations,” said Roy Kais, a correspondent for the Arab affairs channel on Kan 11. He pointed to the connection between Jerusalem and Gaza and said that everyone in Israel knows what the outcome of the relationship will be.

Al-Mayadin further wrote that the widespread consensus among the Zionist media that the Palestinian resistance had achieved a significant victory in the 12-day war and was able to prevent various Zionist ceremonies in Jerusalem confirms that the Palestinian resistance is at the forefront of the front in It has stood up to any aggression by the Tel Aviv regime, and in a situation where the role of the Arab countries in protecting Al-Aqsa Mosque has been marginalized, the resistance has been able to establish itself as the true guardian of this holy place.

The memo goes on to say that Israeli circles believed that by approving a dangerous plan that would affect the sanctity and status of Al-Aqsa Mosque, entitled Al-Aqsa Mosque, in preparation for the demolition of Al-Aqsa Mosque and the construction of the Temple of the Temple, a new phase of Judaism was at its peak, but the Zionist plans were quickly crushed by the Palestinian resistance in the Battle of the Sword of Jerusalem, and the Palestinians were able to impose their conditions on the Zionists, and the results continue to benefit the people of Jerusalem.

Al-Mayadin added: “Although the scenario of war for Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and his government could be a way out, for him it is a double-edged sword. In just one week, Bennett failed two tests against the Palestinian resistance and did not dare to allow Zionist groups to slaughter their vows in the courtyard of Al-Aqsa Mosque. “It happened.”

According to Sharhbil al-Gharib, the author of the memo, the Palestinian resistance on the first anniversary of the Battle of the Sword of Jerusalem once again succeeded in imposing the Gaza-Jerusalem equation and declaring that the Battle of the Sword of Jerusalem continues against the Israeli regime. . The steadfastness of the people of Jerusalem and the support of the Palestinians in the 1948 occupied territories of Gaza and Jerusalem was a key element in the formation of a comprehensive Palestinian revolution. This happened at a time when the Tel Aviv regime has always tried to divide the Palestinian community, and this is what worries Tel Aviv more than anything else, and the explosion of the situation in occupied Jerusalem, Al-Aqsa Mosque and other areas of occupied Palestine. The West Bank and the Occupied Territories of 1948 are extremely scary.

Al-Mayadin stressed that the deterrent power created by the battle of the Sword of Jerusalem continues to frighten the Naftali Bennett’s cabinet and is a continuing victory for the Palestinian resistance; Simultaneously with the calm in Gaza, Jerusalem and the West Bank are the scene of clashes, and this shows the continuation of the Gaza-Quds equation and scares the Zionists from another battle called “Quds Sword 2”.

According to this memorandum, the Palestinian people and their resistance are proving day by day that their will and power were able to destroy the dream of Judaizing Jerusalem and turning it into the united capital of Israel. Rather, Tel Aviv is now incapable of confronting and confronting the Palestinian revolution in Al-Aqsa Mosque on the one hand and Gaza on the other.

The Palestinian resistance in the battle of the “Sword of Jerusalem” proved that it is able to count the zero moment to defend Al-Aqsa Mosque and once again become the dominant and main actor in the Palestinian scene. In particular, it has been able to influence and threaten the future of the Israeli coalition in a situation where Naftali Bennett may refuse to engage in an open and comprehensive military battle with the resistance.

Al-Mayadin wrote in the end that in general, in drawing the current scene of Palestine, it can be said that the Zionist regime, which had previously taken the initiative and started sudden wars against the Palestinian people, is now incapable and fears the cost and consequences of any war. He is afraid and faces unprecedented critical situations and deadlocks with political divisions.

End of message.