FootballSport

Arbitration experts should comment more carefully



Mizan News Agency – According to the official media of Persepolis Club, Hamid Motahari, the coach of Persepolis football team, said: “We played a good game.” Especially in the second half, we had a good advantage and conditions in terms of ownership, which was noticeable. From this advantage, we got good opportunities, which unfortunately we could not take advantage of.

He continued: “In this game, we were able to use the side channels well.” That was our plan and we got what we wanted, but we could have been a little better at speeding up the attacks and moving the ball in the third of the attack, and we still have work to do. Inshallah, this issue will be implemented better in the next game. In general, we deserved to win and we could have won this game.

“There was a visual error and at first glance it looks like something else, but that scene was not a penalty at all,” said the Iranian coach. I saw the opinion of arbitration experts in this regard. I ask them to see this scene again and then comment. In that scene, Esteghlal striker Daewoo had started before Farshad Faraji reached him, because he could not reach the ball. I saw that some refereeing experts also said that this was not a penalty scene; The Esteghlal striker hit the fence before Faraji arrived and threw himself to the ground so there was no error in our penalty area.

End of message /

.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button