FootballSportFootballSport

Referee expert for Foulad-Perspolis match


In an interview with the sports reporter of Tasnim news agency, Nozer Rudneil said about Hassan Akrami’s performance and his help in the match between Foulad and Persepolis: “The game was very confrontational and the referee tried to manage and use less of his cards, while he could have done more.” to give In the 9th minute, while the steel player was on the ground behind the Persepolis penalty area, the ball hit his hand, which was not India’s, but the referee declared India’s foul. In the 23rd minute, the assistant referee mistakenly caught the Persepolis player offside, even in a situation where this team had a good situation.

He continued by pointing to the increase in the conflicts between the players in the second half: in the 50th minute, Morteza Pouraliganji, the defender of Persepolis, prevented the movement of the Foolad striker behind the Persepolis area, and the warning was correct in that scene, because the Foolad striker was not in a one-on-one position and a defender He was present in that scene.

Rodneel stated: The warning to the Canaanites in the 87th minute was correct. In addition, the referee could have given the Foulad defender a yellow card in the 90+5 minutes for hitting the Persepolis striker. 5 minutes of lost time in the second half was not enough, because the game was interrupted at one or two points.

He said: I advise the fans to let the players play their game. In fact, they interrupt the flow of the race by throwing objects on the ground and destroy the rhythm of the race. All in all it was a tight game and the referee tried to manage, while he could have given more warnings.
end of message/

Leave a Reply

Back to top button