The approval of the Human Rights Council resolution against Iran was not a Western action – Mehr news agency Iran and world’s news
According to Mehr News Agency; “Robert Maley”, the US special representative for Iran affairs, has reacted on his Twitter account to the recent adoption of the UN Human Rights Council resolution on Iran.
The US special representative claimed about this resolution: “The resolution of the United Nations Human Rights Council, which was supported by a large number of countries from around the world, was not a Western action, contrary to the claim of the Iranian government.”
Robert Mali further claimed that this resolution, far from being anti-Iranian, looking for It is to support the people of Iran.
It should be noted that America and European countries continue to support the disturbances in Iran, a resolution Anti-Iranian In the United Nations Human Rights Council with the title “The situation of human rights in Iran”! Read, approved. China, Pakistan, Eritrea, Venezuela, Cuba and Armenia to this resolution Anti-Iranian They voted against and declared this action of the UN Human Rights Council as “politicization”.
The countries of Bolivia, Brazil, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Malawi, Malaysia, Mauritania, NambiaQatar, Senegal, Sudan, UAE and Uzbekistan also abstained from the resolution.
Argentina, BeninCzech, Finland, France, GabonGambia, Germany, Honduras, Japan, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Montenegro, Nepal, Netherlands, Paraguay, Poland, Korea, Somalia, United Kingdom, Ukraine and America voted in favor.
The aforementioned anti-Iranian resolution was approved by the instigation of America and the West. Despite the fact that the Americans themselves are considered the biggest violators of human rights in the world, they have not been condemned in international forums due to their political influence.
After the adoption of this resolution, Gennady Gatilov, the permanent representative of Russia to the United Nations and other international organizations based in Geneva, called this resolution illegitimate. Gatilov emphasized that such a decision was taken “purely in the background and with a political mindset” and its purpose is to make the Iranian authorities guilty simply because the West does not like them (Iranian authorities).
He emphasized: We consider this (resolution) illegal because such actions should be carried out with the permission of the country in question. In this particular case, no consultation or agreement on the establishment of such a mechanism with Iran has been carried out. All these measures are aimed at exerting political pressure on Iran.
According to him, the founders of this proposal should focus on their own country’s internal problems, because otherwise, “all these actions will be a clear example of double standards.”
Also, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a statement condemning the anti-Iranian resolution of the United Nations Human Rights Council, calling it an anti-Iranian action by a small group of Western countries and completely rejected.
Mehr news agency in Social Networks follow