The derby observer’s report was sent/ Do Sapinto and Biranvand escape from the ban?

According to the sports reporter of Fars news agency, the Persepolis football team passed the Esteghlal barrier with a score of 1-0 in the 100 capital derby yesterday and temporarily climbed to the top of the table.

However, this match, like any other derby, had side effects, although these were not controversial. This morning, the derby supervisor prepared his report and sent it to the league organization so that it can be submitted to the disciplinary committee.

Apparently, this report does not mention a very specific issue. For example, regarding the controversial incident of Alireza Biranvand’s joy after the end of the game, which caused the Esteghlal club to file a complaint against the Persepolis goalkeeper to the ethics committee, there was no mention in the match supervisor’s report because apparently he and the referee did not see this scene and should Decisions should be made according to other documents such as photos and videos.

Also, the match supervisor did not mention any specific point in his report regarding the conflict between Seyed Hossein Hosseini and Mehdi Abdi before and after the game with one of the law enforcement agents, when a Jimmy Jump entered the field, and for this reason, if the disciplinary committee intends to To have access to this subject, he must use other documents.

Regarding the move that Ricardo Sapinto made towards Payam Heidari at the end of the game, Reza Abdi, as an observer and the referee himself, did not report any discussion about the obscenity or offensive behavior of the Portuguese head coach. Despite seeing this movement, they believe that this action is normal in football and that Esteghlal’s head coach did not swear in English, and if there is a document stating that he was swearing in Portuguese, the disciplinary committee should magnify other documents. However, the members of the disciplinary committee cannot refer to the supervisor and referee to prove Sapinto’s violation.

One of the important points mentioned in the observer’s report is the presence of about 40,000 fans in the stadium and some fans sitting on the second floor. This is despite the fact that it was previously announced that 15,000 tickets will be sold for the 100th derby. The report of the presence of excess people is based on field observations and there are no accurate statistics in this case. Of course, since the electronic ticket sales, apparently, the supervisor of the game does not enter into this matter.

Minor clashes between some Maghrib fans is another case mentioned in the observer report.

end of message/