According to Mehr news agency, the economic consultant of Esteghlal Club announced that although the remaining amount in the club’s account was supposed to be used for payment of Stramachoni, it was allocated to other matters during Fethullahzadeh’s tenure and mismanagement was made in spending this amount.
Ali Dolatshahi, who was an economic consultant in Esteghlal Club during the management period of Ajurlo and Fethullahzadeh, firstly, regarding the conditions of this club in recent months and the crisis of Stramachoni’s payment claim, he said: The fact is that the club was helped in this matter and should be. Let’s accept this fact.
He continued: After the management changes, it became clear that Stramachuni is the most important issue of the club and we held meetings in the privatization organization on this matter. Mr. Gurbanzadeh was against withdrawing the remaining amount of stock money and believed that part of this money was spent and the club’s capital should not be spent, but finally with the help of Mr. Dr. Sajjadi, Minister of Sports, this money was withdrawn and Mr. Gurbanzadeh was convinced that this money The club should be paid, but when the money came, it was not properly managed inside the club.
This money was taken with the title that we would not be removed from Asia and spent in this department, which I think was in January, but it was used to pay the players and current debts, and it was actually mismanaged.
It was necessary to withdraw the Stramachoni money first, because they had withdrawn it under this title and we were not allowed to spend this money in the current section, and due to the acute problem of Stramachoni, this amount was withdrawn from the account. Of course, I myself was not in the process of paying this money because the CEO of the club has the first and last word and we were not in the process of spending this amount.
The economic advisor of Esteghlal Club also said about the spending of the previous part of the stock sale amount: the truth is that Mr. Ajurlo used 80% of his time for economic work and income generation. He believed that the club should make money and this is an important mission. Ishan thought that he could return this money from future earnings, which I don’t think is possible to predict the future, and for this reason, I think it was wrong.
Also, in order to withdraw this amount, the necessary approval should be obtained from the privatization organization. Again, I must point out that Mr. Ajurello intended to return this amount to his account using future income, but in economic work, future events cannot be predicted.
Dolatshahi also stated: We had taken a facility that we did not spend from the principal, and the installments of the facility were paid from the profit. Mr. Ajurlo’s action was deferred to the future. No money was received at all and this issue is not true. We had a contract until November, when this contract ended, and the financial sponsor supported and accompanied us until the contract expired. The strategy of the club was that we advertise and negotiate and get this money in the new season like the previous season.
The economic consultant of Esteghlal Club also said about the income generation of the club managers: Mr. Ajurlo’s income generation during his period was about 200 billion, and during Mr. Fethullahzadeh’s time, I think the income generation was not significant and maybe it was about 20 billion. Regarding the increase in the number of players’ contracts, I must say that the main reason for the increase in the number of contracts was that we were competing with industrial teams. Our 5 billion player signed a 25 billion contract with an industrial team. Naturally, Esteghlal and Persepolis clubs should achieve stable income by using their own brand and large fan base and use their own assets.