data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4911/b49117259a5f7abe27f72afe962c49ac00a82ff9" alt="Why did the disciplinary committee not deal with Sapinto's words against the referees in the derby?"
According to the sports reporter of Tasnim news agency, the 100th derby ended on May 3 with a 1-0 victory of Persepolis, which opened the fringes and controversies of this match to the events of this game as expected by the disciplinary committee of the Football Federation.
Alireza Biranvand’s movements after the game, Qaidi’s words in the mixed zone of the stadium, throwing objects by the fans, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini and Mehdi Abdi’s conflict with the officers of the special unit and finally the ugly words used by Sapinto to the referees, including the sidelines and events of this game It was sensitive, but the disciplinary committee in its decision about Derby 100 was satisfied only with the suspension of Biranvand and Qaidi, as well as the monetary fine of the Magyars.
This decision raised doubts about why the disciplinary committee did not investigate Sapinto’s behavior. Tasnim’s follow-up in this regard shows that no official complaint has been filed by the judges’ committee against Esteghlal’s head coach in the disciplinary committee, and therefore the disciplinary committee has not entered into this matter. Although some experts believe that the disciplinary committee can investigate and judge cases from television images, but apparently the members of this committee believe that in order to deal with Article 71 of the disciplinary regulations, an official complaint must be submitted by a club or organization. The Disciplinary Committee regarding the behavior of Seyed Hossein Hosseini and Mehdi Abdi with the special unit officers also had the same opinion as Sapinto’s behavior and due to the lack of an official complaint against these two players, no decision has been issued against them. end of message/