Burjam’s achievements for Israel were greater than any military attack – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news
According to the Mehr news agency, the website of the Zionist newspaper Haaretz in an analytical report has addressed the challenges and obstacles facing Tel Aviv in opposing the Iran nuclear deal.
The report says that despite the many criticisms and rumors that existed during Netanyahu’s time against the previous nuclear deal with Iran and even Netanyahu denied it, but now some Israeli politicians in the Knesset (Israeli parliament) are out of the current situation. Surprised, they admit that the initial agreement with Iran was not too bad for Israel.
“It has been a while since a marginal war broke out in the region, and the escalation of the situation over the past year has led to the revelation of some issues,” Haaretz writes. Iran fired a missile at an Israeli database in Iraqi Kurdistan. A widespread Israeli attack on an Iranian drone project in February has now been uncovered, with a group of Iranian hackers claiming to have hacked into the cell phone of the Mossad chief’s wife, releasing small details. These events occur at a time when world powers and Iran appear to be moving closer to a nuclear deal in Vienna. Russia and perhaps Iran are raising some issues at the last minute, but the general focus is still on presenting and signing a new agreement. Tehran on Wednesday released two Iranian-British nationals jailed for years for plotting to overthrow and spying for Israel, in exchange for which Britain paid $ 550 million to Iran, funds Tehran had demanded since the Shah’s rule. “He did it.”
The Zionist newspaper believes that these moves could predict the imminent signing of a new agreement, although Tel Aviv will not be satisfied with this agreement. “Naftali Bennett and his ministers are not accustomed to publicly arguing with the Americans, but they have many complaints about the new deal, arguing that (the new deal) puts Israel in a more dangerous position than the original nuclear deal,” Haaretz writes. 2015 puts.”
“Israel is simultaneously examining the reasons why then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposed the nuclear deal seven years ago and concluded that the initial 2015 agreement was not so bad for Israel, and most importantly for Israel,” the report said. “Time to buy, because no military strike on nuclear sites can achieve the same result (against Iran).”
“The challenge now is to follow Netanyahu’s legacy, which persuades former US President Donald Trump to abandon the nuclear deal,” the paper said, noting that pursuing a Netanyahu-like path in the face of a possible nuclear deal now faces challenges. 2018 is that Iran’s violations now make Tehran shorter enough to stockpile enriched uranium to build a bomb, and second, that Israel is taking action to strengthen its military capability and military option in the golden period of the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal. did not.”
In recent years, Borjam’s staunch supporters in Iran have accused critics of aligning with the Zionist regime, and by labeling such women as blocking any technical and fair criticism, they have claimed that Israeli officials’s apparent opposition to Borjam It is a sign that this agreement is appropriate.
“If no last-minute change happens again, it looks like we are approaching a new strategic reality,” Haaretz said, referring to the imminent resumption of the Iran nuclear deal. Iran will return to the nuclear deal with some international oversight, but it is much closer to building a bomb than it was in 2015 because of the knowledge available to it (and perhaps some of the material it has accumulated). “Tens of billions of dollars will spill over into Tehran as economic sanctions are lifted, and international attention to Middle East events will continue to decline as the crisis spreads in Europe and relations between the United States and China deteriorate.”
“In the military arena, all sorts of long-term confrontations between Israel and Iran are likely and will likely continue even after the agreement is signed,” the report said. The new rules of the game, which the Iranians are now publicly announcing in the American media, call for a response to any Israeli attack, and in these responses there is no connection between the scale and location of the attack and the nature of the response. “It could be a missile, a drone, an RPV (remote-controlled vehicle), a massive cyber attack (such as an attempt to attack government websites in Israel last week) or just trolling a specific target.”
“The exchange of blows between Israel and Iran is reminiscent of a water polo game, where most of the violence takes place under the watchful eye of the spectators and the referee,” the report concluded. The danger is that an increase in attacks, many of which are currently being carried out on Iranian soil rather than in neighboring territories such as Syria or Iraq, will eventually lead to a miscalculation and a wider military conflict. “Even if the Iranian nuclear project is completed or halted in a deep freeze, Bennett will speak in secret meetings about a ‘death with a thousand blows’ strategy against Iran, and in this campaign, Israel may at times bleed.”