But what if it reaches the airwaves on time during the broadcast of a series/”Investigator”? – Mehr news agency Iran and world’s news
According to Mehr’s reporter, the “Investigator” series is one of the important TV series that has a sensitive subject about some real court cases, and according to the public relations announcement of this series, it was supposed to be aired at the same time as the Judiciary week. But now the issuance of a notice to broadcast this series has faced some ifs and buts.
this Serial Produced by Mohammad Reza Shafiei, written by Hossein Tarabnejad and directed by Ahmed Moazzami, it was produced in complete silence, and its teasers have been aired on Ik Sima channel for the past few days.
Now, according to the notification, “with the complaint of a private plaintiff and according to the opinion of the judicial authority and with the order of the 9th branch of the Culture and Media Prosecutor’s Office with regard to Article 29 of the Law on the Protection of the Rights of Authors, Authors and Artists”, the broadcast of the series has been ordered to be stopped.
In a part of this ruling, addressed to the vice president of Sima and the manager of Channel One, it is stated: “Since the case is being investigated, but Despite the knowledge and information of the producer and the production team that until the outcome of the investigation is determined, they should refrain from any action that leads to the violation of the plaintiff’s rights in accordance with the regulations and that the respected broadcasting organization is the highest model for the protection of literary and artistic property rights. And although the said series was commissioned by the honorable judiciary (which itself is the highest model for the rule of law and the administration of justice), it should not be used as a pretext for violating the said rights and putting the case in the position of carrying out the action. So in in line The duty stipulated in Article 29 of the Law on Protection of the Rights of Authors, Authors and Artists should be prevented from any publication, broadcasting and distribution of the said series.
The noteworthy point is that the judiciary has participated in the preparation and production of the “Investigator” series, and the issuance of this verdict, on behalf of the judiciary itself, is one of the examples of the independence of the judicial authority and the judge; because the judicial authority has ordered to stop broadcasting in a case that it knew was made with the cooperation and order of this authority and is supposed to be occasion The judiciary should be broadcast on TV.
Mehr Pagir News Agency will seek information about the positions of the production team of the “Investigator” series regarding the claim made and also the judicial follow-up of this issue by the plaintiff of the case.