Car imports “temporarily” canceled?

According to Tejarat News, with the new objections of the Guardian Council to the parliament’s plan for conditional import without transferring foreign currency of foreign cars, this plan was returned to the parliamentary industry commission for the second time.

Organizing the car industry and market is a 10-article plan that was drafted and approved by the previous parliament, but due to the problems of the Guardian Council with the mentioned plan, the final approval of the mentioned plan did not reach the tenth parliament.

With the beginning of the work of the 11th Majlis, the Guardian Council resolved the problems of the said plan, was once again on the agenda of the Industries and Mines Commission of the Majlis, and with the deletion of Article 5 and the amendments made to Article 4, The Guardian Council was sent.

Opposition of the Expediency Council

When the plan was approved in the open court of the parliament, some deputies announced that the Expediency Council and the Parliamentary Research Center opposed the plan.

In addition, experts, union activists, and automakers described the plan as flawed and ambiguous, making it unlikely that it would be approved by the Guardian Council.

What were the ambiguities of the plan?

Ambiguities such as the import of cars without currency transfer, the conditionality of imports on the export of cars and parts by all individuals and legal entities, the postponement of determining the details of the project in the Ministry of Industry and the intervention of the Competition Council in the field of car imports led experts and union activists to rent And warn of corruption due to the incomplete implementation of this plan.

While some unofficial news reported that the Guardian Council’s research institute agreed with this plan, yesterday the spokesman of this council announced the return of the plan to organize the automobile industry to the parliament to eliminate the mentioned problems and ambiguities, problems that are considered by the Expediency Council and the Guardian Council. Is located.

A member of the parliamentary industry commission considers that resolving the problems and re-approving the plan in the commission and in the open court of the parliament requires a time process of at least 2 to 3 months.

The return of the automotive industry to parliament

Yesterday, the spokesman of the Guardian Council, referring to the ambiguities of the decision to reorganize the automotive industry, said: Returns.

Hadi Tahan Nazif added: The plan to organize the automobile industry, which was used several times between the parliament and the Guardian Council, was reviewed by the Guardian Council yesterday. The last remaining objection to this plan was Article 4 on the import of electric and hybrid vehicles, which, of course, was completely changed by Parliament.

Ambiguity in imports without currency transfer

He emphasized: after examining this plan in the Guardian Council, the members of the council had ambiguities regarding the mentioned resolution. For example, there were ambiguities about importing without transferring currency because it involved different divisions and the parliament was asked to make the issue a bit more precise and transparent.

Tahan Nazif said: “Also, in one of the notes of this article, the approval of other regulations was entrusted to the Ministry of Industry, and if these cases are specified more precisely, it will be possible to comment on it better.”

Contradiction with the general policies of the system

He added: “The High Board for Supervising the Good Implementation of the General Policies of the System, which is based in the Assembly, has also announced in its letters cases that contradict the policies, and according to the regulations, we are obliged to announce these cases to the Assembly.”

The spokesman for the Guardian Council continued: “This delegation considers Article 4 to be contrary to the policies of national production and protection of Iranian labor and capital, the policies of the resistance economy and the policies of the administrative system. It will be announced to the parliament.

He said that the Guardian Council had the same one or two ambiguities regarding the resolution that we have announced, but the High Supervisory Board has announced more discrepancies to us. The Guardian Council and the Guardian Council will re-examine the resolution and the contradictions introduced by the High Supervisory Board of the Assembly in this amendment and approved by the Assembly.

The plan was returned to the Industries Commission several times

A member of the Industries and Mines Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly said about the fate of this plan after the new ambiguities of the Guardian Council and the Expediency Discernment Council: In examining the said plan and approving its 9 articles, the council made objections to Article 4 of this plan and returned the said plan to the parliament to fix the problems.

Ruhollah Izadkhah said: The previous objections of the Guardian Council to Article 4 of this resolution were that with the amendments made in the Industries and Mines Commission and the final approval in the open court of the parliament, it was sent to the Guardian Council again for final approval.

Article 10 was initially approved

He stated that Article 10 of the plan had already been approved by the Guardian Council and had been finally approved, adding: “Since the parliament has sent the plan to the Guardian Council for final approval after the final approval, this council may The review has introduced objections to Article 10 of this plan or has clarified the objections of the Expediency Council in this regard.

Izadkhah said that according to the spokesman of the Guardian Council, according to the report of the Expediency Council, the provisions of the parliament’s resolution on liberalizing car imports are considered illegal. The open court of the parliament said: some criticisms and objections about the mentioned plan were quoted by the Expediency Council and the research center of the parliament related to Article 4 of this plan.

He added: “During the review of this plan in the open court of the parliament, the statements of Mostafa Mirsalim, the representative of the people of Tehran in the parliament, also referred to the objections of the Expediency Council to Article 4 of this plan. .

2 to 3 months to correct

Regarding the process of reviewing and approving this plan in the parliament and the Guardian Council, Izadkhah added: considering the closure of the parliament next week, the mentioned plan will probably be referred to the Parliamentary Industries and Mines Commission next week to fix the problems. Examining and resolving these problems in this commission will be the turn of the public court.

He informed about the process of 2 to 3 months to review this plan in the Industries and Public Court Commission and said: with the elimination of the problems in the Industries Commission, this plan should be on the agenda and reviewed in the open court of the parliament and if approved The final in public is sent again for final opinion and approval by the Guardian Council.

Source: Hamshahri news papar

Read the latest car news on the Commercial Car News page.