FootballSportFootballSport

CEO of Saipa: The Disciplinary Committee issued Shams Azar’s decision based on expediency/ we are following up the case in CAS and FIFA


According to the sports reporter of Tasnim News Agency, Saipa Club submitted the necessary documents to the disciplinary committee of the Football Federation regarding the fakeness of the military exemption card of Sidemjatbi Hosseini, a player of the Shams Azar Qazvin football team. Automobile manufacturers believed that all the matches in which Hosseini played should be declared 3-0 in favor of the rivals.

The Disciplinary Committee meeting was held yesterday evening (Monday) to review this case and the parties presented their defenses regarding this issue. Today, the disciplinary committee issued the decision of the case that by admitting that the above exemption card was fake, Mojtaba Hosseini was banned from football fields and three points were deducted from the Shams Azar team in the next season of the Premier League. An incident that has been protested by Saipa agents.

The disciplinary committee has voted based on expediency
In an interview with Tasnim, Mehdi Hosseinipour, CEO of Saipa Club, said: The disciplinary committee has issued this sentence based on expediency. Similar to this happened in the past two years for the Golgohar Sirjan, Pars Tehran and Damavand Amol clubs, and these teams were declared losers 3-0 due to the use of unauthorized players. This happened again in 1400 and with the complaint of the Pars pioneer team against Parag, the matches of this team were declared 3-0.

or they cannot decide about Saipa; Or there are issues that we are unaware of
Continuing his criticism of the disciplinary committee’s decision, he said: “I don’t know what is the point of friends not being able to make a decision about Saipa.” Or there are issues that we don’t know about. Maybe the issue of interpretation of the law is involved. Paragraph five of Article 61 is silent in the law and if the friends have made a decision based on their own interpretation, this should have happened to the teams before us. What makes Saipa different from other clubs?

In the league, a violation has been committed; Shams Azar’s head was cut off in the Premier League
The CEO of Saipa Club stated that Shams Azar was fined in the Premier League. This is like if you file a complaint against someone for theft and they say that we only count the theft of the first floor until 12 o’clock at night, and after 12 o’clock at night, we have to say that there was a theft from the second floor! A violation was committed in League One and Shams Azar’s head was cut off in the Premier League. This means disobeying the law.

We follow up the case in the appeals committee, CAS and FIFA
Saying that the above fine is not a good thing for Shams Azar, Hosseinipour noted: Why is a violation that happened in the first division league counted in the Premier League? Whatever happened in League One should be considered in these competitions. Friends have made a decision based on expediency and maybe such a decision should have been made. We have the appeals committee and the CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport) and if we don’t get a result, we go to FIFA. It is the right of Saipa Club to defend our right.

Saipa Football Team, Disciplinary Committee of Football Federation, Shams Azar Qazvin,

If our game with Shams Azar ends 3-0, we will win the Premier League
Regarding the statements of Iran’s football legal expert Reza Shahmansouri about the need to sue Shams Azar’s rival clubs to deal with this club’s violation, he said: I defend the rights of my club and I cannot comment on the actions of other clubs. What hurts Saipa is what happened last season when Shams Azar played against us. If this match (Shams Azar-Saipa match) is declared 3-0, we will advance.

I don’t know what is going on in this football
The CEO of Saipa Club said to Tasnim: “I don’t know what is going on in this football. They say, “Whatever he says, they put salt on it; Woe to the day when it says salt. A crime has been committed in this case and there is an article that says that if such a crime is committed, it should be dealt with this way. You ask respected jurists about this clause and we are subject to their statements.

We are subject to the decision of the disciplinary committee, but we go one step higher
In response to the question whether Saipa had prepared itself to participate in the Premier League or not, Hosseinipour said: We have a good team so that if we enter the Premier League, we will get a good result. Even if we were in League 1, we will try to advance to the Premier League. We are subject to the issued vote, but we go one step higher and pursue our right up to FIFA. God helps those who seek their rights.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button