According to Mehr News Agency and quoted from the website of the Football Federation, the new votes issued by the appeal committee are as follows:
* Regarding the appeal of the Khyber Khorramabad Cultural and Sports Club by Mr. Javad Abbasi regarding the decision No. 3264 dated 12/6/1402 of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the verdict was sent to the appellant to pay the amount of 5,400,000,000 Rials Regarding the salary of the contract dated 6/4/1400, plus the court fee, the appellant has been issued the right to appeal. It has not been implemented, which would harm the protesting petition, according to Article 17 of the rules of procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, the petition has been issued, it is confirmed and announced that this decision is final.
* Regarding the appeal of Mr. Mehdi Taghizadeh to the representation of Mr. Yusuf Behzadi Kalash on behalf of the Shahr Khodro Cultural and Sports Club regarding the decision No. 3188 dated 14/12/1401 of the Committee on the Status of Players of the Football Federation, according to which the claim of Mr. Yusuf Behzadi Kalash was rejected. The demand for money has been issued to the appellant’s party in view of the fact that the lawyer of Masharalieh does not have the authority to refer to the football federation, the players’ status committee and the judicial organs and has no position. It can be observed that paragraph 2 of article 6 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee on the Status of Players regarding the obligation of lawyers or representatives of natural persons to refer to notary offices and draw up an official power of attorney refrains from mentioning and clarifying the limits of authority, even though lawyers are required to have a lawyer’s license. They are not referred to official notary offices, but it does not mean that the delegated authorities do not specify the specifications and litigants and refer to the federation and committees and judicial organs, and the players status committee derived from paragraph 1 of article 1 of the constitution of the federation is not considered a quasi-judicial authority. Considering the total content of the case and the arguments contained in the issued decision, no objection and effective objection that would harm the protesting petition was made, based on Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee on the Status of Players of the Football Federation, while rejecting the objection, the petition issued was affirmed and affirmed. It is announced that this vote is final.
* Regarding the appeal of the Khyber Khorramabad Cultural and Sports Club by Mr. Mohammad Ali Safia regarding the decision No. 3272 dated 12/6/1401 of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the verdict was sent to the appellant to pay the amount of 4,350,000,000 Rials for the salary of the contract dated 10/6/1400 plus the court fee has been issued for the right of the respondent to appeal. The effect that would harm the protesting petition has not been implemented, according to Article 17 of the rules of procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, the petition has been issued, it is confirmed and announced that this decision is final.
* Regarding the appeal of Saipa Cultural and Sports Club by Mr. Saeed Mohammadi Far regarding the decision No. 3571 dated 5/25/1402 of the Committee on the Status of Players of the Football Federation, according to which the ruling on the appellant to pay the amount of 3,280,250,000 Rials for The salary of the contract dated 7/26/1400 plus the court fee has been issued for the right of the respondent to appeal. It has not been implemented, according to article 17 of the rules of procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, the issued decree is confirmed and announced as final.
* Regarding the appeal of the Saipa cultural and sports club by Mr. Amirhossein Hosseinzadeh regarding the decision No. 3309 dated 12/21/1401 of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the ruling on the appellant to pay the amount of 1,335,717,600 Rials for The salary of the contract dated 8/1/1397 plus the cost of the proceedings has been issued for the right of the respondent to appeal. It has not been implemented, according to article 17 of the rules of procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, the issued decree is confirmed and announced as final.
* Regarding the appeal of Vista Turbin Cultural and Sports Club by Mr. Alireza Maleki regarding the decision No. 3227 dated 10/12/1401 of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the ruling on the appellant to pay 609/00/000 Rials for the salary of the contract dated 8/5/1400 plus the court fee has been issued for the defendant’s right to appeal, considering the total content of the case and the arguments contained in the issued decision, the objection and effective objection that would harm the protester’s document was not implemented, based on Article 17 of the Law The proceedings of the Committee on the Status of Football Federation players while rejecting the objection, issued a decree, it is confirmed and announced that this decision is final.
* Regarding the appeal of the Saipa Cultural and Sports Club on behalf of Mr. Taha Shariati Khamene regarding the decision No. 3139 dated 11/8/1401 of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the judgment was sentencing the appellant to pay the amount of 1,725,000,000 Rials for The salary of the contract dated 6/25/1397 plus the court fee has been issued for the right of the respondent to appeal. It has not been implemented, according to article 17 of the rules of procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, the issued decree is confirmed and announced as final.
* Regarding the appeal of Saipa Cultural and Sports Club by Mr. Reza Khorsandi regarding the decision No. 3563 dated 23/5/1402 of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the ruling on the appellant to pay the amount of 450,000,000 Rials for the salary of the dated contract 11/8/1401, in addition, the court fee has been issued for the right of the respondent to appeal. It is observed that the objection bill of appeal is not substantiated due to reasons and reasons, therefore, considering the total contents of the case and the arguments contained in the issued judgment, objection and effective objection that violates the petition It was not implemented by the objector, according to Article 17 of the rules of procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, a decree was issued, and it is confirmed and announced that this decision is final.