Disputes with Iran are small and important / Maximum pressure against Iran did not work – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news
According to the Mehr news agency, quoted by Reuters, «ند Price, a State Department spokesman, told reporters at a news conference on the status of the Vienna nuclear deal that “minor but significant differences” prevented a final agreement.
Price His country, which has been a major factor in the withdrawal and disruption of the nuclear deal in Vienna, has also claimed that it is seeking an agreement on Iranian soil.
The US State Department spokesman further acknowledged the differences between the US and Israel and said: “No. It can be hidden that we have tactical differences with our Israeli allies, but what does not exist is a strategic difference at strategic levels. “We and our Israeli allies are determined that Iran will never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon.”
The State Department spokesman’s remarks about the Vienna nuclear deal with Iran come after “Anthony بلینکنThe foreign minister had recently traveled to occupied Palestine, where he met with Zionist officials to discuss Iran.
In the continuation of this meeting Price “Everything that was promised to us in that period – the so-called better deal with Iran – turned out to be not only wrong,” he said of the maximum pressure of the Trump era and the increase in sanctions and restrictions against Iran. , But in almost every case the exact opposite has been concluded. Iran’s nuclear program More importantly Of all, it has developed. Instead of taming Iran’s proxy forces, they have in fact witnessed an intensification of their activity and greater audacity ام And you can calculate it in a few ways, but here’s an important way: From 2012 to 2018, there were no significant attacks, no attacks on US forces and diplomatic facilities in Iraq, but this year 2018 changed, and between 2019 and 2020, the number of attacks by Iranian-backed groups increased by 400 percent. This was after the decision to leave Borjam. After deciding to apply a terrorist list to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and after the assassination of Sardar Soleimani, he was the commander of the IRGC.
The State Department spokesman said: “It is clear, therefore, that previous attempts to restore Iran’s nuclear program to a certain extent and to try to suppress Iran’s proxy forces have failed. We want to see if we have a strategy that works and is effective. When it comes to Iran’s nuclear program, we still believe that a reciprocal return to adherence to the IAEA is the right solution. This is not speculation on our part. From January 2016 to May 2018, our route was fully implemented. Iran complied, and Iran’s nuclear program was truly testable and permanently limited, meaning that Iran was permanently barred from acquiring nuclear weapons. This is the reality, the reality that we have already experienced, and we want to return to it.