Generalization of “Iranophobia” to “East phobia”; New West project for 2022

According to IRNA on Tuesday, the French newspaper Le Figaro reported that “several major crises in the field of political geography threaten the international balance”, referring to Iran’s capability in the field of nuclear technology, regardless of the fact that The Islamic Republic of Iran has repeatedly stated at the highest level that it will never seek military exploitation of nuclear technology and that the production of nuclear weapons is “forbidden”, claiming that this country is one of the first of these threats.

In its report, the French publication also reiterated the claims of the West, the United States and NATO that Russia might invade Ukraine, and listed issues related to China and Taiwan, as well as Russia and China in the list of future threats to the world. .

The making of such claims in Lofigaro’s report shows that this time the West is not content with Iranophobia and is pursuing a broader plan of “Orientalism”. In this plan, the powers of the Eastern bloc are all on a list that are the only causes of crisis for the world in the new year. In his report, however, Lofigaro did not mention the crises and sufferings that the United States and its Western-NATO allies have caused to the world, at least in recent decades, including the crises in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In this article, Le Figaro claims: The first case of these threats is Iran’s nuclear case, but this is not the only case. However, this could threaten the Middle East by creating a real transformation.

This report, without the slightest mention of the Zionist regime having a nuclear weapon, which has happened to establish itself in the Middle East region and adds all kinds of excuses to the size of its occupied territories, calls Iran a threat to the region in 2022.

Two months ago, the British newspaper The Independent reported that the Zionist regime was planning to significantly increase the amount of ammunition in its arsenal following the finalization of the military budget.

“Iran left the talks after the June presidential election and repeatedly violated the UN Security Council,” the report’s author, Isabelle Lasserre, continued. A comprehensive joint action called Burjam was withdrawn.

According to IRNA, the Islamic Republic remained in the treaty after the withdrawal of the United States from Borjam, and the reward for this commitment was the continuation of oppressive sanctions and the adherence of other parties to Borjam, which confronted Tehran with a full-blown economic war.

These days, the eighth round of talks between Iran and the P4 + 1 group has resumed in Vienna, Austria, while three years after Trump’s unilateral withdrawal from the UN Security Council, Iran’s nuclear program is by all accounts at its most advanced stage. In this round of talks, diplomats in intensive political, technical and legal negotiations are finally trying to resolve the issue of lifting the harsh sanctions against Iran and the return of the United States to the UN Security Council.