Iraj Tahmasb or Asghar Farhadi? The problem is!

According to the Fars news agency’s art correspondent, these days, when the “guest” collection of Namava is being broadcast and excerpts from it are being shared on social networks, some cultural experts are warning about the immorality of this puppet collection and its misbehavior for children.

“Mohammad Sadegh Dehnadi”, a media management graduate, is one of these people who wrote a note on his personal page entitled “Iraj Tahmasb or Asghar Farhadi? “That is the problem.” Has dealt with this issue. Of course, he has emphasized that he has laughed a lot with some “guest” items and has no problem with Iraj Tahmasb and his new composition. He also agrees with the presence of the greats of television to establish the non-governmental economy of the media, and considers it useful to strengthen the non-governmental media by celebrities who have been introduced and promoted with the money of the people.

The following are excerpts from this memo:

– “Guest” in a right rail is a wrong effect for Iraj Tahmasb. As soon as a red hat director’s semi-puppet work receives a positive 12-year-old age rating, and your 12-year-old has hundreds of questions about insults, obscenities, and the association of some issues; It can be said that the team of the guest series has hit the last wire to attract the attention of the elders who are in their pockets to see it.

– Apart from a few characters that he did not take at all, and the incoherent and non-stick actors who were and are not the same, the puppet world of the former “Mr. Executor”, the guest child of a charlatan and rude child who looked lovable, a mosquito full of marital sex allusions , An ugly doll in the role of a furry girl (I apologize for using this phrase), two musician dolls with the title of unrestrained and satirical pop music and young people in this field. But practically the whole work on the shoulder is the same obscenity that is republished in cyberspace that, for example, the audience comes to his air and sees the game of stuffing and flies.

– If we do not take into account the tribal and irrational media reception of Tahmaseb’s guest house out of nostalgia or interest in preserving him in the media ecosystem, we must reiterate that for some activists claiming the country, it’s a playful concept to beat the opponent, otherwise we can not go to the stadium. The women were sensitive but did not react to the ugly images of women and girls shown in the series.
In a society where more than 3 million girls are at risk of definite celibacy; The production of the character of a girl with this ugly appearance who has not found a husband and is struggling to find a suitor and the approval of that series to the love of the individual or from the stubbornness of a section, by the intellectual faction claiming to defend women’s rights is nothing but showing an elite society full of social puffiness Not the exact meaning of the word).

– The difference between Asghar Farhadi and Tahmaseb is Mr. Mojrei’s constant commitment to the concept of family, and incidentally, our most important criticism of Tahmaseb is to cross this narrow line and the point of dispute. Mr. Mojrei has been known for generations to be the trustee of a teacher for the education of children and adolescents. He was not the director of “About Ellie” from whom we would like to learn the techniques of discovering extramarital affairs.
The rejection of the beloved presenter of the children of the sixties and seventies and eighties of the important and vital family lines to get a superficial audience in a freer environment raises the rumor that either he has changed and believes that he should get the audience anyway or from the beginning. He did not believe in this.
“Asghar Farhadis” believe that if there is an issue in a corner of society, they should show it and have nothing to do with its good or bad (as if in “Seller” you are faced with a fictional world in which 10% of people are right. They are not) but Iraj Tahmasb is the one for our generation who, even in his adult work (when he makes a bad friend or a girl who sells sweets) did not have the middle ground by showing immoral issues.
We want him to be the teacher of the next generation, just as he was our teacher.

End of message /