Israel ‘s arrogance against Iran is to the detriment of US interests – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news

According to Mehr News Agency, “Paul Pilar” is a professor at Georgetown University in the United States, who in his professional career has been the head of the CIA Operations Analysis Unit in the Near East, Persian Gulf and South Asia; In a note to the Quincy Institute; He warned the Washington administration that “Israel’s reliance on an attack on Iran is a threat to US interests.”

Pilar, who also served on the US National Intelligence Council; He begins the memo by comparing the speeches of Iranian President Seyyed Ebrahim Ra’isi and Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett at the UN General Assembly, and considers Ra’isi’s selection and Bennett exaggeration to be two different approaches to strategic implementation. The two international rivals have chosen to face each other in the Middle East.

Explaining the issue, Pilar added: “In his almost 2,000-word speech, Ibrahim Ra’isi made a brief reference to the ‘Zionist occupation regime’, which included two sentences about the regime’s oppression of women and children and how the siege of the Gaza Strip , Has created the “largest prison in the world” while continuing its statements calling for a referendum with the participation of all Palestinians of all religions and ethnicities, including Muslims, Christians and Jews.

Pilar went on to say in a critical tone that Naftali Bennett gave two-thirds of a much longer speech to Iranophobia and blamed the country for everything that happens in the Middle East; Allocated from its nuclear program to what happened in Iran three decades ago; Expanded.

The Georgetown University professor went on to stress that Bennett’s exaggeration was an example of the inconsistency of the length of the mainnote speech, a common flaw among Israeli officials and their American supporters, often citing a poor translation of Mahmoud’s remarks. Ahmadinejad »Former President of Iran announces the elimination of Israel from the world map.

“Even if these threats are verbal and do not materialize militarily, there is a clear example of how Israel is facing retaliation,” Pilar said, referring to the recent Israeli move to allocate $ 1.5 billion to attack Iran. Joey uses it as the cornerstone of his security strategy, which aims to clear himself of the destabilizing actions he is taking in the region; In the hope that it will divert the attention of the world public opinion from its behavior, especially on the issue of the occupation of Palestine.

Pilar goes on to write that an example of a strategy of confrontation with a foreign enemy can be seen in the former Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s arrogance against Iran, which was aimed at consolidating his position in Saudi Arabia. A Georgetown University professor finally warns Washington not to be fooled by Israel’s game because the regime’s goal is to conflict with US interests.

According to Pilar, Saudi Arabia is a good example of the fact that a slight change in US policy has led Bin Salman to back down from his confrontational game and take a softer stance toward Iran.

At the end of the memo, he reminds the United States that, in the Middle East and elsewhere, dialogue and a policy of de-escalation will serve Washington’s interests more than confrontation and the threat of war.