Ken was accused of censorship / festival response to a complaint against the ticket system
While the problems created in the online ticket sales system of Cannes Film Festival were faced with users ‘complaints the day before, the officials’ answer is that they are trying to solve the problem, but censorship has been raised in another case.
Theater News Base: The day before, the online ticket purchase system for the press faced protests, and the Cannes Film Festival issued an official statement saying: The technical problems that arose this morning in the online ticket sales service are most likely due to the saturation of the site, and as a result It prevents the festival audience from accessing it. We are trying to solve this problem.
A number of journalists and critics took to Twitter yesterday to express dissatisfaction with the festival’s ticket sales site, saying the site would not allow access to book tickets.
Martin Cantrio, a film critic, wrote on Twitter that it would be fair to call the online ticket sales system junk, which is like a riddle.
The festival has set up a separate sales site for the press just to give journalists more access to booking tickets.
Meanwhile, the Cannes Film Festival 2022, which officially starts tonight, was accused of trying to censor the press the day before. Festival director Thierry Fermo confirmed at a press conference yesterday that he had asked publications to correct his quotes, saying it was a French tradition, which is not surprising.
“There is no self-censorship or even a bit of censorship,” he said. I do not give.
Regarding the turnout of female directors, Fermo said that this year only 25% of the films submitted were made by female directors, and we have allocated 25% of the festival films to films made by women, which is a good number. He recalled that it was only 10 years ago that UNESCO noted that only 7% of executives worldwide are women. However, he noted that some gender quotas are included in the short student competition section (formerly called the Cine Foundation) because this section is the start of young filmmakers and everyone should have the same opportunity.
But what Variety did not address was that Fermo’s answers were given in response to the Deadline movie magazine, which accused Fermo of censorship in a detailed article the day before, saying that after an interview with him last month that was about to take place. The festival was published in the form of a special issue, forcing him to give the text to him for review, and removing some thoughtful but potentially problematic responses. These adjustments were made in response to a question about Roman Polanski’s reception of the festival, to which Fermo replied that French law had not changed since Polanski won the Palme d’Or, and that the director’s presence would not be a moral problem. Her response to the lack of female directors was also dropped, and Deadline was eventually forced not to publish the interview due to its contamination.
Deadline also notes that another publication has been forced to remove full questions and answers about the absence of black directors.
The publication stressed that it had faced tense calls from the Cannes press office along the way, and said that they would not be able to have a similar interview next year.
The magazine’s correspondent stressed that similar cases have been observed in the past, which is not in line with professional journalism, but in the midst of fierce competition for access to officials, priorities may be diverted.
He recalled that a few years ago, he exposed Cannes’ discriminatory behavior in forcing women to wear high heels, which provoked a strong reaction from film industry figures, and that such an issue is no longer the issue of Cannes. Culture changed because it was time for a change.
This reporter emphasized; Fermo stressed that freedom of expression is necessary to ensure greatness, and that the press is included in this.