Mashhadi: No one is against the principle of regulation in the home television network

According to Fars news agency’s art reporter, the home show network and the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution’s decision to regulate and monitor it has become a controversial issue in the cultural and artistic atmosphere of the country.

Issues and criticisms were formed after the announcement of this decree, each of these cases can be discussed from different angles. The point that is clear, obvious and undeniable is the existence of the home television network and its importance in people’s entertainment, and of course the need to monitor and regulate it.

Saeed Mashhadi, the head of the Content Production and Publishing Union in the virtual space, said in an interview with a Fars news agency reporter: “If we want to describe the general atmosphere created after the announcement of the decree, we must say that everyone believes that there should be regulation and regulation; “I don’t think anyone is fundamentally opposed to regulation in the home network.”

* The home show should not create a cultural challenge

He went on to say: “In the meantime, there are several issues that have led to discussion; firstly, some people believe why radio and television should be chosen for this matter, secondly, some people consider the regulatory policies of this organization to be difficult to monitor the home show.” They know it’s catchy, and finally, some critics believe that radio and television and the home television network are competing with each other, and this resolution limits the competitive space.

Mashhadi further stated: “In front of these issues, there are a number of problems in the field of culture that must be addressed. One of these challenges is that it must be determined by an upstream institution what content should be produced and distributed in the ubiquitous audio and video space. To be published; It is not possible for a platform to produce content without considering cultural dos and don’ts and not pay attention to its destructive cultural effects, and then government cultural institutions spend money to remove these effects.

The head of the Content Production and Publishing Union in the virtual space explained this case: “For example, a series may be produced and published in the space of the home television network, during which drinking Khmer is promoted and shown, the producer and the broadcaster are looking for the viewer. There are more and they do not correct these cases and after that the cultural institutions must try to erase the destructive effects of this series, it is not possible for one person to destroy and another to follow him to correct it, this destruction should not be done from the beginning, it is not possible to have a home show even if it is not Deliberately create a cultural challenge in the country; In order to solve this incident, there must be a regulation.”

* Radio and television can create a space to solve criticisms

He continued: “Another criticism that is raised is that Sed and Sima is a competitor of the home television network, firstly, this criticism should be formed in the correct way and from its own path, secondly, Sed and Sima can also change its direction and create an atmosphere to resolve these criticisms and move away from the position of slander, if the radio station explains that it does not compete with the home television network, which it does not have in reality, this case will also be resolved.”

The head of the content production and publishing union in the virtual space said: “In the discussion of the strictness of broadcasting in monitoring, it should be said that these indicators should be made into a standard in every issue and should be announced publicly so that every producer knows that the content he produces is within the framework. and whether the necessary standards are compatible or not; In this case, the producer either has a problem with the original standards, or must operate in accordance with these standards.

In the end, regarding the opinions of some artists, Mashhadi stated: “Every business tries to operate in an environment where it has the greatest financial benefit, and naturally, in any discussion, it will take a position in favor of the same environment, in this The celebrities are the beneficiaries, and the home network and private platforms are the financial beneficiaries; So, if it is based on expert discussion, this group is a beneficiary and their opinion is biased.”

end of message/