No power can destroy Iran’s nuclear program – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news
Mehr News Agency, International Group: The Vienna talks resumed with the presence of the new team of the new Iranian government on December 29th, and have continued to this day, despite the intense Western media campaign and despite the fact that the European troika practically only negotiated in the early days without any constructive proposals. has it. However, in spite of all the ups and downs, Iran was able to resolve the gap in the previous six rounds with the steadfastness of its steps, by properly laying the path for negotiations, and to include its legitimate demands in the base text.
Meanwhile, although the seventh round, which was the first confrontation between the negotiating team of the new Iranian government and the European troika, had a heavy atmosphere, the eighth round, which is still ongoing, has seen progress that even the European parties can not hide.
At present, all four issues of lifting sanctions, nuclear commitments, verification and guarantees demanded by Iran are being pursued simultaneously.
At the same time, as the negotiations progress, the Zionist regime has intensified its irrational rhetoric, while the regime and its Western allies know that the slightest mistake will be met with a resounding response from Tehran.
Mehr News Agency reporter regarding these developments with “Ali Haidar” The expert on the issues of the Zionist regime has had a conversation, part of which is as follows:
The Zionist newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reports in an article that Tel Aviv is extremely pessimistic about the outcome of the nuclear talks between Iran and the four-plus-one countries in Vienna. The question now is whether this pessimism is the cause of the Zionist regime’s recent and growing threats against Iran, and whether the regime’s goal is to disrupt and put pressure on the negotiation process, or whether it is really seeking preemptive strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities if the Vienna talks fail. ?
The fact is that the Zionist regime is really worried about the outcome of the Vienna talks and believes that dangerous scenarios are emerging against Tel Aviv. According to the Zionists, if there is an agreement to return to the 2015 nuclear deal and the lifting of sanctions against Iran, Iran will become a nuclear state and the most important tool of pressure against Tehran, which is the sanctions, will be removed from this country. It has security, economic and military consequences for Iran, and its allies in the resistance axis will also be affected by these developments.
The Zionist regime’s assessment is that the United States will never enter into a large-scale military confrontation with Iran as the regime demands. But the failure of the talks means that Iran will continue to develop its nuclear program unconditionally. Tel Aviv’s assessment is that the United States will never engage in a large-scale military confrontation with Iran as the regime demands. If an interim agreement is reached in Vienna, Iran will redeploy its nuclear capabilities as it does now, guaranteeing continued nuclear progress and the partial lifting of sanctions.
To deal with both scenarios of failure or success of the nuclear talks, the Zionist regime forces itself to build and develop military capabilities and review large budgets to support it. Simultaneously with these actions and assessments, and in order to achieve its goals, the Zionist regime has also increased the level of its threats against Iran. The regime is trying to play the role of a regional police force as part of its pressure on Iran, as the United States has effectively withdrawn from the option, hoping that Iranian officials’ fear of Tel Aviv threats will increase and that decisions will be made. Their influence at the negotiating table.
The Zionist regime is trying to take military action against Iran if the Vienna talks fail, but in the event that Tel Aviv takes refuge in military action, these considerations cannot be ignored, which makes it very impossible for Tel Aviv to take military action without US support. Use against Iran’s nuclear facilities. Of course, unless military confrontation is a mandatory option and is imposed on this regime, which in the current situation, its preconditions are not provided. Accordingly, and given the complexities and dangers, the lack of alternatives and, most importantly, the strengthening of the resistance axis, Tel Aviv to prepare, develop military capabilities, conduct successive exercises and increase the level of threats against Iran can be interpreted And analysis.
* The Islamic Republic of Iran continues to adhere to its positions and conditions in the Vienna nuclear talks, and at the same time the Iranian armed forces are conducting the “Great Prophet (PBUH)” exercise, which is said to have been a serious and direct warning to the Zionists and carrying multilateral messages. Dad. What is Tel Aviv’s assessment of these developments??
Undoubtedly, the exercise of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) had powerful messages and signs that do not need to be argued and explained. For this reason, the Zionist regime was widely covered in the media and social networks, and these media covered the explicit and direct messages of Iran from conducting this exercise. The exercise raised the level of official recognition by Zionist officials of Iran’s ability to expand in a number of areas, and proved to the regime’s decision-makers, including Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, that the government under its command is in a dangerous and unprecedented situation. They found that Iran had advanced air and drone defense capabilities, as acknowledged by Chief of Staff Avio Kokhawi and Israeli War Minister Bani Gantz.
The Zionist regime’s assessment and decision-making authorities received the message of the Great Prophet’s (PBUH) rehearsal that any military aggression by the regime on Iranian soil would be met with a deterrent and destructive response.
The Zionist regime’s assessment and decision-making authorities received the message of the exercise that any military aggression by the regime on Iranian soil would be met with a deterrent and destructive response. They also realized the range, accuracy and destructive power of Iran’s missile and drone capabilities, and that direct and indirect threats against Iran would not lead to deterrent results. Undoubtedly, the messages of the Prophet’s training will have a significant impact on the decision-making power of the Zionist regime officials to consider any hostile operational option against Iran.
* What will be the consequences of any possible attack of the Zionist regime on Iran on the military part of this regime? What is the role of the resistance in any possible confrontation in the future, and what will be the preparations of the Zionist regime’s internal front for this confrontation?
The political and security authorities of the Zionist regime, when considering any military and security option against Iran, pay more attention to the two elements of efficiency and cost of this option. Regarding the effectiveness and usefulness of military action against Iran’s nuclear program, three ceilings can be set: First, stopping Iran’s nuclear program at its current level. Second, bring it back a few decades and third, end the program. As for the third option, it is certain that the Zionist regime or any other party will not be able to do so, because Iran’s nuclear program has been produced and developed inside this country, and when this knowledge is localized inside Iran, then neither side with any No tool can stop the Islamic Republic from developing and expanding. This means that the nuclear program is tied to the name of the Islamic Republic, and as long as this system is in place, no power can deprive Iran of the will and ability to develop and advance the nuclear program.
The Zionist regime or any other power is not able to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, because this program has been produced and localized inside Iran.
But regarding the first and second roofs, which are the most maneuverable in the Zionist regime’s internal circles and its disputes with the United States over Iran’s nuclear program, it should be said that the impact of any operational option against this program is more limited than ever due to the current Zionist regime. Iran, too, may take a leap forward in any military action against its nuclear program, as we saw after the Natanz bombing.
Another issue that the Zionist regime’s domestic and foreign circles are considering is that in the event of any attack on Iran’s military bases, the Zionist regime’s territory will be hit by rain rockets and all its strategic facilities. This concern was evident in the recent Israeli exercise, in which the entire territory of the regime from north to south and east to west was considered the target of hypothetical attacks.
Given the limited effects of the direct military option and its enormous costs, Tel Aviv is forcing itself to have greater political, strategic, and operational coordination with the United States. It is in line with this view that senior Zionist officials acknowledge that Tel Aviv will not take military action against Iran except under duress and only when it does not see itself in the face of two options: a nuclear bomb or a bombing.
.