“Ontario” Supreme Court’s negative verdict on the confiscation of Iranian property in Canada – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news
According to Mehr News Agency, quoted by Euro News TV channel, the Supreme Court of “Ontario” voted against confiscating the assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Canada on the false pretext of paying compensation to the survivors of the crash of Flight PS 752.
According to the announcement of this television channel, the Supreme Court of Ontario, by rejecting the petition to seize some property and government accounts of Iran in Canada regarding the compensation for the crash of this plane, announced that these properties belong to the Islamic Republic of Iran and based on the rules of international law include immunity. will be
The CBC television channel announced that some families of the survivors sought permission from the court to seize 3 properties in Ottawa and withdraw money from the Iranian government’s bank accounts.
Media Center of Judiciary on Thursday, December 24, held the third hearing of the case of the crash of Ukraine Airlines 747 with the presence of the accused, Shakat, and the family. Those who have lost their lives And their lawyers headed by Judge Ebrahim Mehranfar in the military court of Tehran province made media.
Earlier and during the two previous sessions of the court, Shakat and their lawyers had problems with the investigation stage and expert opinions in the case, and the judge, recognizing these problems, returned the case to the prosecutor’s office to fix some deficiencies, and today and after The court was held to resolve these problems
At the beginning of the court session, Judge Mehranfar, while condoling the martyrdom of the Ukrainian flight PS752 and asking for God’s forgiveness for them, stated: The court believes in this and is determined to have a fair and just trial according to the religious and legal principles that govern the criminal procedure. be During the process of filing the case and reviewing it, the content of the case was available to the lawyers of the plaintiffs and the defendants, and they were closely aware of the matter and studied the case.
After the indictment was read by the prosecutor’s representative and the charges were explained to the defendants, Judge Mehranfar invited the plaintiffs to the stand and asked them to speak about the case and present their requests in court.
A number of plaintiffs, while presenting their content, addressed the chairman of the court session and said: We ask the chairman of this court to issue a decisive and decisive verdict.