Mobile and tabletScience and TechnologyScience and TechnologyMobile and tablet

Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus with 200MP camera did not get a good score from DxOMark!


The Redmi Note 12 series was introduced to the global market a few weeks ago, and in the meantime, the Pro Plus model with a 200-megapixel camera attracts more attention. However, DxOMark tests show that the large number of megapixels in this phone’s camera does not mean high quality.

Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus has very attractive specifications on paper. This phone supports 120W fast charging and the screen refresh rate is 120Hz. One in the camera department 200 megapixel main sensor contract. But the website DxOMark It says this phone in 74th rank All the phones they have reviewed are included.

Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus from this reference Overall score 113 received, which is even less than the iPhone 11 with the main sensor of 12 megapixels. According to this ranking, the Noting Phone 1 and Xiaomi 12T phones have a better camera than this product; However, their sensors look weaker on paper and have at least fewer megapixels.

Advantages and disadvantages of Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus camera

The camera of the new Redmi phone performs well in daylight. This camera dynamic range It provides suitable and White balance It is acceptable even in low light environments. In addition, Automatic exposure In this phone, it works well in both bright and dim light modes.

Sample photo of Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus

But DxOMark says some Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus camera images with problems like Halo reflection, color errors and artifacts It is facing and even suffers from a decrease in the speed of autofocus. 4K videos also suffer from loss of detail and excessive resolution.

This authority says that the ultra-wide 8 megapixel sensor of this device does not have a special definition. On the other hand, there is no mention of a dedicated telephoto camera to offer true zoom capability. So DxOMark claims that we are not dealing with a powerful product in terms of camera.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button