Republicans frustrated by obstacles in the way of a possible US return to Burjam
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/234e3/234e3ef333e6eedfb8436bc2cc691062f1794891" alt="جمهوریخواهان ناامید از مانع تراشی در مسیر بازگشت احتمالی آمریکا به برجام"
According to IRNA on Monday, the American media website Hill, referring to the recent letter of 33 Republican senators who threatened Washington that they will block its implementation if it does not submit a possible agreement to the Congress, said that the Democratic government’s indifference will lead to There was intense fighting, and Republican lawmakers rushed to formally vote against a possible Vienna agreement.
According to Hill, Democrats are confident that if the government submits such a document to Congress for a 60-day review and vote, they can, by a Biden veto, block a majority vote against it or even fund it.
According to Hill, opposition to the Barjam agreement requires 60 senators’ votes. In 2015, the Republican-controlled Senate was joined by four Democratic senators, Chuck Schumer (New York State Senator and current Senate Majority Leader), Bob Menendez (New Jersey Senator), Ben Cardin (Maryland Senator) and Joe Manchin (West Virginia Senator). ) Could not oppose Borjam and 58 opposition senators did not agree with 42 senators who agreed.
Now that Republicans hold 50 Senate seats, and despite the presence of anti-Burjam Democrats, it is unlikely that the number of benevolent votes will reach the golden number of 60.
Realizing the obstacles, Republicans optimistic about winning the 2022 midterm elections appear to have been waiting for congressional control since the beginning of 2023 and threatened to break the deal if they won the 2024 presidential election.
Ted Cruz, Texas Sen. and founder of 33 Senators
Recently, 33 Republican senators wrote a letter to the President of the United States asking for their views to be included in the possible agreement on the return of the United States to the UN Security Council and to vote on its provisions, threatening that otherwise they would try to implement a possible agreement on the return of the United States. They will throw stones at Barjam.
According to these senators, any agreement with Iran is so important for the national security of the United States that it is a treaty and requires consultation and approval of the Senate.
According to IRNA, all the delegations participating in the talks had intensive meetings with the representatives of Iran and the United States on February 14th. Many details of the content of these regular meetings have not been leaked, but it is possible that these movements are not unrelated to the new package proposed by Iran.
In an interview with IRNA, an informed source said that the Iranian negotiating team had encouraged the other parties to take the initiative from the beginning of the talks, adding that now was the time for the US to decide and that the country should “stop dragging out this process and uncertainty.” »
In fact, the movements of the members of the P5 + 1 and the European Union at the Marriott Hotel and the meeting with the US representative also show the fact that all the delegations are waiting for the US decision. If the White House makes the necessary decisions, especially in the area of lifting sanctions, the negotiations can be summed up in a short time.