Europe and AmericaInternational

Robert Mali: We can not guarantee the next US administration’s approach to the agreement



According to IRNA, Robert Mali, in an interview with MSNBC television network, which was published today on the website of this American media, while acknowledging the disagreement between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the return to Burjam, called for the attention of current Tel Aviv officials. It was regretted by former regime officials in support of the US withdrawal from the UN Security Council.

Regarding the Zionist regime’s opposition to the peaceful activities of the Iranian nuclear program, he said: “We disagree with the Israelis about returning to Burjam.”

He added: “In recent weeks, almost every day, former senior Israeli officials, including supporters of the US withdrawal from the UN Security Council, have called the decision catastrophic in terms of the cost to Israeli security.” He called on current regime officials to pay attention to such statements.

The US official reiterated that the goal of the Trump administration’s maximum pressure campaign to halt Iran’s nuclear program has backfired, and that Washington is ready to lift the sanctions imposed on 100 Iranians by the previous US administration against Borjam.

Robert Mali, meanwhile, avoided answering the MSBC’s explicit question as to why the United States, despite withdrawing from Borjam, was unwilling to return to the deal before Iran, and claimed which side was sooner. Return to agreement is not the main issue.

He also did not give a definite answer to the specific question of the executor that Iran has the right not to trust the United States and to ask it to guarantee that the withdrawal from the agreement will not be repeated, claiming that the current administration can not guarantee that the next US administration is out of the agreement. Will not.

The host of MSNBC asked Mali that he was the first American to leave Borjam and now why he does not return to it unconditionally?
He claimed: “The issue is not what country has left Borjam in the first place.” If you mean that the United States must first return to Borjam and wait for Iran to act in its entirety, I must say that the negotiations of the last 10 months show that such a move is not so simple.
“We have differing views on whether the United States will live up to its commitments again,” Mali said. The Iranians are asking us to lift all the sanctions that Donald Trump has imposed, and we say that some of the sanctions that he has imposed are due to Iran’s behavior and have nothing to do with the nuclear deal, and we intend to maintain them, any How many sanctions will be lifted?
He added: “On the other hand, we also have requirements on how Iran will re-adhere to its obligations, which we have not yet agreed on.

He went on to say that the US delegation would return to Vienna in the coming days to resume talks. He said the US government sees the return to the UN Security Council as in the national interest and prevents further tensions in the Middle East.

While claiming that Borjam is the best way to limit Iran’s nuclear program, Mali reiterated in a threatening tone: “If we do not reach an agreement soon, think of other ways to address Iran’s nuclear program.” We will.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button