Shahcharagh incident series has reached pre-production/”Criticism of the series” is on the agenda – Mehr news agency Iran and world’s news
According to Mehr reporter, the twenty-ninth The episode of “Cinema Criticism” program aired last night on August 27 on Chahar Sima channel.
This week’s special discussion table “Cinema Criticism” with the theme “Archive, History, Cinema” and with the presence of Mehdi Naqoyan, the head of the center. Cimafilm And the documentary was established.
He first about the products Cimafilm said: Cimafilm During the period of transformation, it entered the historical genre before my presence in this institution, and currently works are being produced. In fact, there has been a variety of genres in the field of serialization, and I can say that we have 11 or 12 works in hand right now.
head of the center Cimafilm He stated: We welcome fair criticism and we are looking to produce a program similar to “Cinema Criticism” with the title “Series Criticism” to criticize our own works.
Naqoyan continued: During serialization based on history, we had the series “Fire and Wind” that went on air. Also, the broadcast of the series “Ashura” has also started tonight, and soon the series “leftIt goes on the air.
He reminded: TV was always indebted to the antenna and the antenna was always ahead of the production. This problem always interfered with the quality of the work and the work was broadcasted without review and because of this the TV antenna was disturbed.
head of the center Cimafilm In response to the question that his taste in documenting is guided by his taste Cimafilm has led and whether we will see historical works in the future or not, he said: maybe now we want to deal with an event of the 80s, it will be considered a historical work.
He added: We don’t pay attention to many events of the day. Of course, about the terrorist incident Shah-Cheragh also mini A series and a movie is going to be produced, which is currently in the pre-production stage.
In another part of his speech, Naqoyan stated about not using the archive in recent years: because its infrastructure is not available. The identity of an organization is its archive and cannot be given to anyone without rules. Needless to say, the difficulty of obtaining archives is one of the stages of archival documentary production, and I had accepted this issue in the making of the documentary.
He clarified: There may not be a film of a historical event, but its document is available. Creativity is required to use the archive. Also in my opinion the most attractive The issue for archival documentary production is to find the archive, but using it requires knowledge and science. In production, we have the option to shoot from an angle that the audience has not seen, but there is no such thing in the archive. Archive is a work tool and what is important is to tell a story from the story. In my opinion, archival documentary is not a separate genre.
In response to the question why drama films are not made about events such as the August 28 coup, he said: First, I blame my colleagues because they are not concerned about this issue. On the other hand, orders from managers do not happen. Needless to say, we also ignored the archival documentary, while history is attractive to the audience.
In the end, this documentary maker stated: If I made the documentary “Queen’s Mystery”, I would not feel that it is a political work. In my opinion, what is hidden behind this volume of the archive that I worked on is that we were able to present the heavy political and historical narrative in a popular language.