Supporting my terrorist by violating the freedom of speech/ Why is the terrorist network based in London not sanctioned?

Fars News Agency – Radio and TV Group: Applying the adjective media to the terrorist organization “Iran International” is as ridiculous as if someone wants to call the United States of America the ambassador of peace and reconciliation and the stage manager of the counter-terrorism field for the world. The media group, which has been under the obligation of the Saudi government for many years, receives funding for its continued existence by whitewashing the situation of the most reactionary political structure in the region and its allies.

The terrorist organization “Iran International”, which at the beginning of its establishment was formed from the merger of the remnants of the Persian-language media, in its short period of activity has violated the laws of Ofcom or the British media regulatory organization by openly supporting terrorist groups; From hosting the spokesperson of the Al-Ahvazia terrorist group and promoting terrorism on live air to the real-time coverage of the meeting of the notorious hypocrites living in Albania.

DMA Media Company, which has been responsible for the launch of “Iran International”, is one of the companies that has also launched media institutions such as BBC Farsi. “Nabil Khatib” one of the Arab journalists and the former editor of the Al-Arabiya network was responsible for supervising the project of launching this network. These days, the Saudi media, under the cover of a news network under the umbrella of European support, has become a platform for long-standing terrorist groups.

In the following, we have a look at two news channels, one of which is freely spreading terrorism in Farsi with the funding of the Saudi government, and the other is an English-language news channel affiliated with the Overseas Broadcasting Agency, which in the past years has repeatedly broadcast it on satellites under the pretext of Western governments. International is blocked.

The English-language channel “Press TV” is a media owned by the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting and “Iran International” is a news broadcasting network of Saudi Arabia, with the difference that “Press TV” is based in Tehran and the headquarters of the Saudi network is in London. “Press TV” supports the movement of resistance in the region, and “International” covers the positions of the terrorist movements opposed to Iran, and it is the source of the Zionist regime. Most of the presenters and reporters of “Press TV” are non-Iranians, and most of the presenters and employees of International Iranians are against the Islamic Republic.

Now the question is why the United States and Europe, especially the British government, sanction “Press TV” but claim to defend honest journalism in support of the terrorist organization “Iran International”? Why does Ofcom in the UK order the cancellation of “Press TV” but does not issue a ban on the TV channel affiliated to Saudi Arabia?

To get the answer, we have to take a short look at the contemporary history of Iran and Saudi Arabia. At the same time as the third Houth coup in Iran by the British, whose executors were General Ironside and Ardeshir Reporter, and by which the General of Sepah became Reza Shah Pahlavi, a person named Abdul Aziz bin Abdul Rahman, with the help of Englishman Lawrence – nicknamed Lawrence of Arabia – in Saudi Arabia power arrived; They killed Sharif Hussein and his sons and became the foundation of the Saudi government in the Arabian Peninsula.

In the case of the nationalization of the oil industry in Iran by Dr. Mossadegh, the British lost the main capital of the Iranians for a short time, until Ardeshir’s son Shapur the Reporter and their internal mercenaries staged a coup d’état on August 28 in Iran, but the Saudis, according to Lawrence of Arabia They did not have much prejudice against the land of Saudi Arabia and the assets of its people.

After the emergence of American power in the post-Hitler world, the role of the British gradually faded, and at the same time as Pahlavi II came to power after the August 28 coup, the American government signed huge oil contracts with him and Abdulaziz bin Saud, the then king of Saudi Arabia.

Let’s go back to the discussion. “Press TV” sheds light on the attacks of reactionary Hebrew-Arabic armed armies and the voice of the voiceless of the region and the Yemeni fighters, and the international praises the Saudi changes and reforms; If we call the dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi’s body reform and the beheading of dozens of political protesters, change and reform.

Taking these obvious considerations into account, we now understand well why the Biden administration, even the English Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, censored the voice of Press TV in London and Washington, but International was supported by the order of Ofcom.

A review of the historical movements of the liberal-democracy claimants shows that it is not surprising if we see the European Union ban the news channel “Press TV” and the simultaneous support of European leaders to the developer of terrorism in the media. Liberal moral character – Democracy throughout its civilized period, wherever it has not surrendered a nation with the language of dialogue and instruments, it has inevitably inclined the destiny of a nation to an apparent freedom in a Western style.

end of message/