Take a look at the movie “Treason” / a work to satisfy another longing of the director!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45e1f/45e1f6962e4121262f8ffad6bc328bb0854fde39" alt="Take a look at the movie "Treason" / a work to satisfy another longing of the director!"
The movie “Treason” is the title of the latest work produced by the well-known director of Iranian cinema “Masoud Kimiaei”. A character who, at the age of 80, still has a craving for filmmaking and seeks to experience and represent the frames that he has developed in his mind and has always dreamed of portraying them on the silver screen of cinema. Frames that do not matter at all whether they are seen or not seen by the general cinema audience. Cinematic frames that in recent years have always been associated with failed films at the box office. Low-budget films whose turnover not only does not benefit the producers of these works; Rather, it inflicts great losses on investors economically and even withholds at least a return on investment, and perhaps it is important to understand that “Kimiai” is no longer the producer of his works and tries to use the budget and Facilities provided by others to meet your filmmaking needs!
The movie “Treason” is a fantasy of a group that wants to steal from “Bank Melli”. An eclipse occurred on the day of the robbery and Tehran became dark in the middle of the day for minutes like night. “Mahdi”, “Shahrokh”, “Gio”, “Atlas” and … are the apparent thieves of the bank, but they did not ask for this money and with the aim of supporting the “national loan” and helping “Dr. Mossadegh”, they planned the robbery. They have designed.
The movie “Betrayal” is full of famous actors, the presence of each of whom can become a factor in the success of a work at the box office. Actors like “Mehran Modiri” whose mere presence in a movie can guarantee that the movie will be seen on the release date. However, the structure of the film “Betrayal” is so weak in presenting a minimal story and placing logical plots that it is unlikely that this widespread presence will make this work acceptable in the eyes of its general audience. Audiences who are persuaded to watch the “betrayal” because of the “celebrity campaign” and will eventually find themselves saddened and hurt by such a decision.
The movie “Treason” despite its numerous subtitles and captions; A work lacks the necessary legitimacy to be understood by the general public. A work that in its appearance can even be considered as a dumb and lifeless work with a watery story. A work that does not have the minimum atmosphere necessary for historiography and emotion transfer, and in the meantime, it is only the melody of the text that helps and informs the audience how it should feel in the moments of the film! In fact, “betrayal” has placed the task of conveying the tragic feeling and burden of the work on the composer, and with this action taken in the post-production period, he has succeeded in partially compensating for the task of creating the atmosphere for the writer and director.
In general, the film “Treason”, apart from expressing nationalist slogans and focusing on camaraderie and reflecting the legacy of the “Persian film” era, which as an ever-present component of all its director’s works, in recent years has been accompanied by repeated and prominent political allusions. Is associated with today’s society; It is a work that has succeeded more than anything in fulfilling the director’s desire to represent and frame a historical image of “Mohammad Mossadegh”.
End of message /
You can edit this post
Suggest this for the front page