The August 28 coup is a historical proxy battle and continues

According to the Arya Heritage report, Majid Tafarshi, a contemporary history researcher, gave a narration on the third day of the “Coup d’88 Coup” exhibition at the Mellat Palace Museum located in the Saad Abad Historical Cultural Complex and said: “69 years have passed since the Coup D’88 August, this incident is still a trauma and an unhealed wound; It is still part of a historical proxy battle and it is not over and continues. Therefore, the conditions for liquidity are difficult.”

He added: “Another mistake is that when it comes to millions, religious people, leftists and monarchists, it is assumed that we are dealing with a single current, when it is not the case, because each of these has its own subcategory.”

This scholar and history researcher stated: “On the one hand, international historiography is not without mistakes; Both due to the lack of resources and documents and the remoteness of their region. In addition, either those historians themselves were security agents or had close connections with the security agents. Even the American agents paid money to a number of domestic personalities to get their cooperation; They wrote this 35 years ago, but now, after 69 years, they still haven’t submitted documents. For this reason, their sources cannot be verified and unprofessionally, they force the audience to accept blindly.

There is no document for direct communication between Ayatollah Kashani and Shah

Tafarshi continued: “For example, it is stated in the CIA report that Ayatollah Boroujerdi was supposed to take a position in the government, which was very unsubstantiated and based on the words of informants, as well as their claim about the alliance between Ayatollah Kashani and the British.” Obviously, the supporters of Ayatollah Boroujerdi had no desire to enter politics.”

He continued: “Religious followers of Ayatollah Kashani mainly cooperated with Mossadegh until 30 July 1331.” After 30 years, Mossadegh considered himself a hero and did not need Mr. Kashani, so the National Front’s support for him weakened. On the other hand, Ayatollah Kashani certainly had more anti-colonial records than Mossadegh, and his approach was that I returned Mossadegh to power and it is not possible to completely withdraw from politics. Ayatollah Kashani comes to the conclusion that Mossadegh is no longer leading the way and can be dangerous. Relatives of Mr. Kashani, like Mustafa Kashani, were not unaffected in the coup, but there is no document for direct communication between Kashani and the Shah.

Tafarshi emphasized: “Mossadegh’s overthrow had various reasons; In the last six months of Mossadegh’s government, both sides practically concluded that there was no return, and the parliament opened the way for a coup. “All political groups were guilty.”

He reminded: “Mossadegh’s position in Iran’s oil is a significant position. His personal achievements were not small. “The history of the oil industry is beyond the historical review and the political battle that must be overcome in order to open the way for fair criticism and proper review.”

Churchill had a lot of enmity with Iran and Iranians

This scholar and researcher of contemporary history stated: “In the narrative that the CIA organization and the narrative that the British published after the coup, a colonial view of Iran’s oil is evident, but when I talk to British researchers, it seems a conscious disregard for to respond to this category. “One of the issues that all Iranian parties agree on is Britain’s abuse of our national interests.”

The contemporary history researcher stated: “The British and the Americans had a lot of consensus against Iran. When he and Eisenhower took office, there were more agreements. “Churchill had a lot of enmity with Iran and Iranians.”

The August 28 coup created credibility for Mossadegh

In another part of his speech, Tafarshi said: “After August 28, the Tudeh Party realized its mistake and began to revise this issue, gradually causing the historiography of the left and the National Party to converge.”

He pointed out: “In various ceremonies, we rarely see the Pahlavi government proudly talking about the 28th of August, because it had inadvertently created honor and prestige for Mossadegh, but since about 20 years ago, the royalists with the presence of Persian-language media abroad have They stood on the podium, they support Pahlavi’s actions in this coup.