The Pentagon has pledged its commitment to protecting the interests of its allies in the region
“We always look to protect our forces abroad, especially in the Middle East,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said, without elaborating. We typically change this protection based on an existing security threat.
Reiterating the claims, he added that in line with the policy of fear of Iran’s regional influence, we are confident that Iran is still not a good player in the region.
He accused Iran of supporting terrorist groups and expressing concern over the development of Iran’s missile deterrence program, claiming that they would continue to develop a ballistic missile program. Iran continues to develop some of its nuclear capabilities, even while in talks.
A Pentagon spokesman went on to say that the Iranians were harassing the ships and were clearly a threat to the sea.
He claimed that the Pentagon still believes that no problem in the Middle East can be solved more easily with a nuclear Iran. Therefore, we continue to support the efforts of our diplomats as they seek to reach a new agreement on the development of Iran’s nuclear program.
A Pentagon spokesman said: “Despite all this support, we continue to have a fundamental commitment to protecting our security interests in the Middle East and our allies and partners in the region. That is why we still have a strong presence on land and at sea in the Middle East.
A State Department spokesman also referred to Mura’s office in response to reports that Enrique Mora, the EU’s deputy foreign policy chief and coordinator for the Vienna talks, had requested a visit to Iran. And he continues to convey messages between the two sides.
“Our assessment remains that a reciprocal return to adherence to the BRICS is in our national interest because it is permanently and verifiable on the agenda,” a State Department spokesman said in response to a reporter’s question about allegations of losing hope of reviving Burjam. Iran’s nuclear program will impose restrictions.
In line with his policy of fear of progress in Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, he added: “The restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program have been lifted since 2018, and this program has progressed in a way that is unacceptable to us.”
“We will continue to work through dialogue and consultation with our allies and partners in the European Union to achieve this commitment,” the State Department spokesman said.
He added: “These efforts will continue as long as the reciprocal return to adherence to Borjam is in our interests.” If we conclude that Iran’s nuclear progress over the past three years has eroded the benefits of non-proliferation, then we will take a different path.
The eighth round of talks on lifting the sanctions, which began on December 26, last year, entered a breathtaking phase on March 11, 2014, at the suggestion of the EU foreign policy chief, and the negotiators returned to their capitals for political consultations.
Most of the countries participating in the talks want the talks to conclude faster, but reaching a final agreement awaits US political decisions on a few remaining key issues.
The Islamic Republic of Iran says that if the American side acts realistically, it is possible to reach an agreement in Vienna. The agreement in Iran is a document that the sanctions will be lifted as much as possible and the region will also benefit from its implementation.