US Deputy Secretary of State resorted to a tactic at the same time as the Vienna talks

The eighth round of talks in Vienna began on January 26, one of the longest rounds of talks. The participating delegations are completing the draft text of the agreement and deciding on some of the issues on which the final agreement is subject to White House political decisions.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is participating in the talks to reach a lasting and credible agreement, but the Western parties continue to prolong the negotiations by resorting to the tactic of blaming and turning Iran’s rights into concessions for the purpose of extortion.

“All our options are always on the table,” Under Secretary of State Wendy Sherman told the BBC.

Deputy Anthony Blinken, in continuing his claims, instead of stating his country’s commitments to compensate for the breach and the violation of the UN Security Council, while Iran has remained committed to this international agreement, claimed that we are not going to accept everything that Iran offers. If Iran adheres to Borjam, we will enter it completely.

“No matter what is chosen in the negotiations, all our options are always on the table,” he said.

Wendy Sherman also denied allegations that Iran was superior in the talks.

“It’s better to be serious about trying to get back to the nuclear deal with Iran,” said Chris Murphy, a Democratic senator from Connecticut.

“I have no choice,” said a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and chairman of the committee’s Middle East group. To stop Iran’s progress, I do not see anything but re-entry into this agreement, and after leaving the briefing, I know for sure that it is better to try to return to the agreement seriously.

Robert Mali, Joe Biden’s special envoy to Iran, explained to them for the first time that extremists and Republicans in the United States had stepped up their efforts at the same time as the Vienna talks between Iran and the P5 + 1. He answered their questions.

The principled policy of the negotiating team of the Islamic Republic of Iran has been from the beginning that the criterion of negotiations should be the interests, principles and instructions of negotiations, and the time to reach an agreement depends on the provision of these principles. The Islamic Republic of Iran wants to reach a good agreement in the shortest possible time, but it will not rush into negotiations, and fictitious deadlines will not violate the principles and red lines.