US Street Tactics in Vienna Talks / Time-lapse on ‘Interim Accord’ – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b857/3b857b17f62c92c6b7d739831d9a108f5c2ead1a" alt="US Street Tactics in Vienna Talks / Time-lapse on 'Interim Accord' - Mehr News Agency | Iran and world's news"
Mehr News Agency, International Group: The eighth round of the Vienna talks these days remains a one-way street whose end is unknown. Of course, there is no doubt that all parties agree on progress. Expert meetings on the four levels of lifting sanctions, nuclear commitments, guarantees and verification are ongoing, and there are two-on-two or group meetings between Iran and its partners, while the P4 + 1 also holds meetings with the United States. he does.
This introduction depicts the prospect of negotiation forward and calmly, while in the background of this cautious optimism and right in the middle of that one-way street, someone puts his foot on the brake and constantly beeps!
This is the story of the United States these days, which seems to be in a hurry to reach a conclusion, but has also blocked the path of the Vienna talks. Of course, the “foot on the brake and hand on the horn” tactic simultaneously includes a complete set of complementary tactics such as “blame game”, “time constraint” and “temporary agreement” these days, all of which are presented to the audience under the claim of haste to achieve results. .
Washington’s unilateral withdrawal from the BJP is a relatively old story compared to the adventures of the Democratic Joe Biden administration. The current White House helmsman and his foreign policy team, despite all the rush they claim, have spent a lot of time figuring out which side should take the first step back to reaching an agreement. Then it was time to say, “Shame on you, we do not remove a series of labels that Trump has placed on sanctions, but we are ready to talk about other things.” When Iran protested that this proposal was contrary to the principle of reviving Borjam in its original form, the other side justified that “in any case, the ball is now in your court.”
Of course, it is easy for the United States to say “we do not have time, finish sooner” even before the start of the Vienna talks, but from Iran’s point of view, minute by minute, these talks are meant to open one of the blind alleys that sanctions incompatible with Borjam The livelihood of the Iranian nation is very different.
Time consuming on the circuit of contradiction
Following in the footsteps of the United States and its European allies in reaching an agreement, there is a twist that should not be overlooked, and that is the reliance on the weapon of contradiction as another legacy of the Trump era. The best example of this can be considered the phrase “one roof and two air”.
The “foot on the brake and hand on the horn” tactic simultaneously includes a complete set of complementary tactics such as “blame game”, “time constraint” and these days “temporary agreement”. As European troika foreign ministers complain about the slowness of the negotiation process and speak of the permanent closure of the diplomatic window, US President Joe Biden suddenly warns in the middle of a speech that “now is not the time to despair over the Iran nuclear talks and progress in “This field has been obtained.” Then, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken immediately sets the condition, of course, that the survival of those developments depends on “Iran not guaranteeing us because we can not oblige the next US presidents to accept such conditions.”
Would not the result of these claims be that the Biden government is at best seeking a “temporary agreement” with Iran? Unless the guarantee is left open, the United States is left free to strike under the table (a term used to deny a promise made by one of the parties).
Biden knows that Iran will be content with no choice but to reach a permanent, verifiable, verifiable agreement, so it intends to hear a firm “no” answer from Iran through this contradiction, which focuses on showing enthusiasm and at the same time obstruction. To put the blame for the stalemate on the talks on the other side.
Biden knows that Iran is not satisfied with any option other than a permanent agreement, so his intention in this contradiction is to hear a firm “no” answer from Iran in order to put the blame for the stalemate on the other side. On the other hand, the proposal, which is presented to various tricks, this time in the form of NBC News, based on a plan by Russia, is for the Biden government to leave an arrow in the dark, if with a probability of one in a thousand. Aiming to be a major achievement for Democrats, especially in the mid-term 2022 congressional elections.
In the meantime, gathering people in front of the venue with the aim of linking the two issues of return to agreement and the release of dual national detainees by Iran is a new strategy for Washington to darken the prospects of the Vienna talks, especially today “Robert Mali” special envoy The United States has said that “this was a precondition for a nuclear deal.”
Despite all these threats and sabotage, Iran has repeatedly said that the prospect of the failure of the Vienna talks is not attractive to either side. Thus, the smartest option for the United States is to avoid the illusion of gaining concessions from the other side, far from any procrastination, while first of all it has to take its foot off the brakes to open the way for negotiations.
.