Western social engineering propaganda and Cannes festival

According to the film reporter of Fars news agency, the Cannes festival ended with all its obvious politicizations, but the important thing that should be highlighted is the effort of “Cannes” as the most important international film festival in the direction of a kind of social engineering.

It seems that “Can” is subverted, just like the decorative image of this report, it is enough to get a detailed understanding of this subversion and social engineering, which gave a new look to the selections of this festival (filmmakers and works) in recent years.

At the very beginning, we can mention the behavior of this festival since 2010, how with the addition of the “Best Film” award section; It has moved in the direction of glorifying homosexuality.

But this is not the whole story, this process of supporting homosexuality on the one hand and defending French supremacist feminism on the other hand has been extended to the main parts of the festival in these years.

Until now, 76 editions of the Cannes Festival have been held, until the last three editions, only one woman was able to receive the Palme d’Or award, but surprisingly, suddenly in the last three editions, that is, from 2021 to 23 of the three Golden Palms of the festival, Two gold palms have been given to women. 71 periods of one woman taking a palm tree and suddenly two women in three years.

To clarify this issue, it is enough to look at the list of winners of the main sections of the 2023 Cannes Festival:

Golden Palm
The most important award of the festival, the “Golden Palm Award” for the best film, went to Mrs. Justine Trieh.
This is despite the fact that in most of the Western critics’ polls, the film “Anatomy of a Fall” by the same Ms. Terye is not among the first 5 films. As an example, look at the rating table of the critics of the German-language website below, in this table, the film is not among the first five works and stands after the films of Wim Wenders, Glazer, Kurizmaki, Gillan, etc.:

The main prize of the look section
The main prize of the category of a kind of look went to Mrs. Molly Maying Walker from England (whose movie name can’t even be spelled!).

In this section, which means “a kind of look”, the situation is even worse than the main section. Among the 15 French critics in the table below, only one critic has seen the film and he has given the film the lowest score of one!

Golden Palm is the best short film
The award of this section went to Mrs. Flor Buddha for the movie 27.

According to the World Animation Magazine, “this movie is a two-dimensional anime with a simple execution”, but it has anti-family content and promotes feminist ideas.
Finally, the review of the content of the selected films of these years and the winning of female filmmakers in all three main sections with films that did not find a place in the table of any of the critics and on the other hand, except for the film Trieh, the other two films are also highly unethical. ; It clearly shows that the Cannes Film Festival should be considered as a part of the western propaganda machine and the cultural NATO.

end of message/