What was the story of the return of faces to TV? / Rashidpour withdrew! – Mehr news agency Iran and world’s news

Mehr News Agency – Art Group: “The return of faces” has become an issue for television since the arrival of Peyman Jabali, the head of Sedavasima. A media that is always measured by its audience and the audience is considered an important component in evaluating the success of this media.

In these few years, the general audience and even specific cultural and artistic figures spoke about the absence of some figures on television and demanded the absence of Adel Ferdowsipour, who was even mentioned in some student gatherings when the head of the radio station went to the university, to worry about the presenter’s health. The book is open and recently other faces and TV presenters were added.

But recently, among all these faces, two more names were mentioned and the return of some faces was keyed with Reza Rashidpour and Mohammad Reza Golzar. The design of these names and their presence on TV almost turned into a media controversy, and official and unofficial media are reacting to it.

There were reflections from different aspects regarding the return of these people, which included the audience, the lack of entertainment on television, even the reactions of these figures to the events of the past year in official and unofficial discussions, and found many supporters and opponents. Most of the reactions were related to two figures whose names were mostly speculated in this process. Rashidpur and Golzar, whose names were mentioned above. One of them is a TV host who was mostly seen with TV competitions such as “The Last Wire” and the other is a movie actor who recently made headlines with the details of his personal life. He returns.

The plan of these debates was even extended to Twitter debates between supporters and opponents, and among these controversies, statistics from some television programs were raised.

Media reactions were also different and there were criticisms in agreement and opposition to this event. Among these was Mashreq site, which wrote in response to the presence of figures without naming any person: “Even if we do not agree with the cultural and social style of some of the figures whose names have been proposed for return, the rationality of the Islamic Revolution is the opinion of different tastes. Recognizes people. What is important is to follow the principles. principles such as divine laws and the constitution.

We cannot hit all faces with the same stick

The speculations were formalized by the opinion of Mohsen Barmahani, the vice president of CIMA. In a ceremony that was held a while ago, Barmani explained that “we cannot beat all faces with the same stick” and said: “In the last few months, the society has been involved in a cognitive war and has been damaged, and splinters from this war have hit all of us. Is. We can’t hit all faces with the same stick, because each one is a different person. For example, a person was stubborn with the system and his goal was something other than the interests of the people, someone came to a conclusion that he now understands that he was wrong, and… we had similar cases in 2008.”

The vice president of Sima emphasized in another part: “Revolutionary society who are worried should know that Sedavsima does not move against the interests of the country.” We are not going to let someone who has betrayed into the radio and television space, because the radio and television is a platform that people trust.”

Official news of the presence of Rashidpour and Golzar

A few days after these words, the official news of the implementation of Rashidpour and Golzar TV programs was announced in detail, and the agents of both programs announced that their broadcasts will begin soon and both will be aired on Channel Three.

Mohammadreza Shahbazi, the host of “Paveraqi” and “Sidkhandan” was the only host who reacted negatively to the return of these figures on TV and after the official announcement, he said in a video that he is not going to run any more programs.

However, this news was denied by Peyman Jabali, the president of the TV and Broadcasting Company, on his online page, as well as the public relations of the program. Jabali announced on his virtual page about this program that the footer program will continue with the presence of Shahbazi. On the other hand, the public relations of the Foarghi program announced that “We are talking to continue the implementation of this program with the presence of Mohammad Reza Shahbazi. Regarding the resignation of Mr. Shahbazi from the implementation of the Footer program and the events surrounding it, discussions are underway so that with the promises given, the Footer program will continue its journey with his presence.

However, following the continuation of the sidelines, the public relations of Sedavasima published an announcement this morning on August 25 to express the official position of the organization, in order to respond to the matter raised in this space and to clarify its position once again.

Celebrity-centered, presenter-centered, producer-centered and any kind of centrality is rejected

In a part of this announcement, it is stated: “In this era, with full coherence and unity of opinion and management, celebrity-centered, presenter-centered, producer-centered, and any scattered centralization inconsistent with national media policies are rejected and unacceptable.” The approach of the national media in this regard is to emphasize rational management and principled cooperation between the media and figures and to make a serious effort to prevent the repetition of past injuries.

The end of these events and sidelines were the words of Rashidpour on his personal page, who, referring to his efforts to appear on television and perform the contest, said: “It makes me proud to be the voice of a part of the national media community and basically the identity of the national media in this I know the plural of people-centered. All tastes and beliefs should make programs within the framework of security and national interests and have their own audience.

He continued by announcing his withdrawal from appearing on television and wrote, “The fact is that in the current situation, I feel that my presence, instead of being a cause of joy or hope, will cause anxiety in the audience’s mind and intensify the sad bipolarity.” The big bane for our beloved country is these marginalizations and polarizations, etc.”

On the sidelines of the meeting of the government board, Jabali, the head of Sedavasima, said: “Whenever the national media decides to use the faces, it will definitely follow this classification and will definitely pay attention to the possibility of To provide the opportunity and capacity to be seen to those who do not have stubbornness, stubbornness and insistence on moving against the rules, regulations and norms of the society. We will not give space to such people. There is no doubt about this.”