cultural and artisticradio and TVradio and TVcultural and artistic

cantaloupe; Deliberate inference except from the whole and rereading the distortion of an expression


Fars News Agency – Art and Media Group: Talebi said in a part of his talk on the Haft program:some Celebrity women blame their menopause on the Islamic Republic. These actresses Until they reach the age of 50, they take off a headscarf and become critics of the Islamic Republic.

Well, when we look at these sentences, aside from the emotional load of the words and what kind of words should be spoken in what situation, and emphasizing the fact that in this situation, whatever is on the opposite front, the opposition, the excuse-makers, and the adversaries are significantly magnified. and blackened, it can be correctly concluded that in this part of his speech, Talebi had no intention of insulting the position of women, the position of women over 50 years old and the era of physiological and psychological changes of women in the general sense of the word, and as from the phrase “some “Celebrity Women”, he wanted to criticize from his point of view as a cinematographer, without mentioning the names of several women wearing the hijab and those who in recent incidents took such actions with the intention of inciting the youth, and even from the moral aspect, he took advantage of this. He did not want to mention the names and addresses of these women.

In the continuation of his speech, he emphasizes again that “These actressesAnd this phrase has been a re-emphasis on not generalizing this concept to women’s gender and the issue of their physical changes.

Now, however, those who are constantly seeking to provoke the youth and teenagers of the society and are deeply disappointed by the end of the riots, are always looking for emotion-provoking excuses in observing words and sentences. They have propagated this issue to the public opinion as a widespread insult towards women in a general sense, which made it necessary to avoid any misunderstanding.

For several months, many events have been happening in the media, each of which shows a special feature and subtext.

Talebi had given an opinion that maybe before this many women believed that it was okay to express it, even some considered not expressing it as a violation of women’s rights, that this is a natural occurrence for women, why was he afraid to say it.

Now people of the same group of society call saying the same sentence an insult to women.

* Dogmatic thinkers of the time

The opposition, which has fallen into the trap of vulgarity, has said whatever they want in recent months, they have invented a dictionary of swearing, dictators, dictators, etc., but they themselves do not tolerate the slightest criticism – even if it is said in a humorous language and in a witty tone. They expect their voices to be heard without saying anything but cursing, so far they have neither accepted criticism nor sat down to talk, people who are among the great representatives of dogmatic thinking of the time. Yes, bigotry is that you pick up the smallest voice that is against your opinion and boycott and suffocate it with all your heart.

*The trick is the same, “event production” and “media bomb”

With a little reflection on the events of the past months, we can understand the fact that the road map and strategy of all the scandals that happened in the media and especially in the virtual space is the same, finding an event that can be considered a disaster by the common people (regardless of whether it is based on the disaster or not), a huge media bombardment was created around that event and making it big and finally, the end of the stage, you reached the goal, a new controversy was created.

The controversies that are obvious in the blink of an eye are revealed to be empty, and therefore one by one they smoke and go to the air, and in the end, its black face remains for the crows of Qeel and Qal worshipers of the time.

Everything that happened in the story of Talebi is a representation of this, do you want it to be proven to you? Review some of the events that have happened by the current claimants of speaking and observing ethics.

I specifically draw the focus of your historical memory towards Sharif University, where the so-called academic stratum of this claimant group used to walk in the university and turned the most vulgar words into the quotes of their circles.

Maybe your historical memory doesn’t help, that’s no problem; Open one of the publishing platforms of the virtual space on your mobile phone, search for one of the famous hashtags of these people, read a few posts, you will definitely notice the literature of these people.

end of message/




Suggest this article for the first page

Leave a Reply

Back to top button