Judiciary: “Although the words of the approved law are valid and authentic, and it is not justified to refer to the form of negotiations, however, due to the difference in the interpretation of the law, the parliament requests to clear the ambiguity.

According to the General Directorate of Public Relations of the Judiciary, Hojjatul-Islam Wal-Muslimin Mohseni Ajaei, the Head of the Judiciary, in a letter to “Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf”, the Speaker of the Islamic Council, requested to clear the ambiguity of the Parliament regarding Note 1 of Article 5 of the Law “Facilitating the Issuance of Business Licenses” regarding the calculation The result of the bar exam.

In the text of the letter of the head of the judiciary, it is stated that although the colleagues and the deputy of legal and affairs of the parliament of the judiciary believe that the law is not ambiguous and the criterion is “acceptance of the grade”, but some representatives have the opposite opinion in view of the negotiations during the approval of the law in the parliament and the criterion Therefore, although the words approved by the law are valid and authentic and the reference to the negotiation form is not justified, however, due to the difference in the interpretation of the law, the parliament requests to clear the ambiguity.

Yesterday (August 31), Hojjat-ul-Islam wal-Muslimin Mohseni Ajeei, in the meeting of the Supreme Council of the Judiciary, while stressing the observance of the law in this regard and stating that the judiciary considers itself bound to implement the law, ordered his legal deputy that if in the implementation There is ambiguity in the relevant law, urgently and within the same day, request the interpretation of the law from the parliament.