Judiciary » The order of the judge to enter a special inspection on the issue of a dispute between a producer and a bank on the issue of a partnership agreement

According to the Public Relations Department of the Judiciary, a public meeting of Hojjat-ul-Islam Wal-Muslimeen Mohseni Ajeei was held with the aim of addressing the issues and problems of the people and those referring to the judicial system, especially the families of prisoners.

Hojjat-ul-Islam wal-Muslimin Mohseni Ajei during this meeting, which was held as a continuation of his public meetings with the aim of dealing with people’s issues and problems, as well as the pathology of trends and procedures in judicial units, for more than three hours at the Public Relations Center of the Judiciary, with 15 Ten of the applicants met with the judicial system and the representatives of multi-plaintiff cases and while being informed about their issues and problems, issued appropriate orders on a case-by-case basis.

Multi-plaintiff cases were among the most topics and issues raised during this public meeting of the head of the judiciary.

During this public meeting, after hearing the requests of the applicants and studying their files, considering the legal aspects and the proportionality between the items in the files and the requests of the applicants, he communicated the necessary orders to the relevant judicial units.

During the public meeting of Hojjat-ul-Islam Wal-Muslimeen Mohseni Ajei, two referents, representing nearly 100 citizens of one of the western areas of Tehran city, stated that after depositing money into the account of a public institution and buying real estate located in the land belonging to this institution, After 4 years, they still haven’t received the property documents, and the “registration organization” and the “public institution” put the responsibility on each other’s shoulders; In this regard, the head of the Judiciary, during a call with the head of that institution, requested to investigate the matter and said: After examining the matter, if the responsibility is on the registration organization, I will issue the necessary orders in order to issue the property documents of these citizens.

Another case that one of the clients brought to the head of the judiciary was about disrupting the economic system by issuing check sheets in the name of people sleeping in cardboard boxes. This case had more than 450 plaintiffs and 7 people were in custody in connection with it. The jurisdiction of the court has been challenged and this issue has delayed the investigation of the case, and he requested that the investigator of this case, which is open in the courthouse of Mazandaran center, should not be moved to complete the follow-up work of this case. In the same context, during a call to Akbari, the Chief Justice of Mazandaran, the judge issued orders to speed up the handling of this case and considering it important, he recommended that the relevant investigator, due to his nobility, should complete the case. , do not move; The head of the judiciary also stressed that the role of the people providing these checks to the defendants in the banking system should also be considered.

The head of the judiciary clarified that the defendants of this case probably had responsibility in a number of related institutions and there should not be a red line in dealing with them.

In the same context, the head of the judicial system, during a call with “Jehangir”, the vice president of crime prevention of the judiciary, issued orders to him to analyze the issue and emphasized that the category of misuse of checks for criminal purposes is one of the issues affecting the society. It is worth mentioning that on July 14th of this year, during the visit of Hojjatul-Islam Wal-Muslimin Mohseni Ajeei to the Shahid Moghads Prosecutor’s Office in Tehran, two of the defendants whose cases were investigated by the Supreme Court were members of an organized gang of forgery through stolen checks. The members of this gang used to steal several thousands of checks from people’s houses and cars in different cities and tried to fake their signatures and sold these checks for two to three million tomans. The financial transactions of some members of the said gang were over one billion Tomans per month.

Issuing an order to the Chief Justice of Ardabil province to pursue a dispute case between residents of one of the regions of this province with an institution was another part of the public meeting of the head of the judiciary.

Another multi-complaint case brought up during the public meeting of the Head of the Judiciary was the case of an institution that claimed to send students abroad and issue a license to print books and guarantee admission in the field of medicine in the country’s universities; This institution had received sums between 200 and 800 million from some people; the head of the judicial system addressed the person who introduced himself as the representative of Shakat in this multi-complaint case, while reminding him that he must have a notarized paper to represent Shakat, and said: How did you trust an institution for purposes such as publishing a book and admitting it to a university in the field of medicine, which has its own legal and specific path? It is not clear whether the institution that issued the license to print books or admit students in the country, that you were convinced by the mere presence of a sign at the head of a place. It is worth noting that the head of the judiciary pointed out the necessity of examining the role of Shakat in the formation of this multi-complaint case and issued orders to deal with it.

One of the clients to the head of the judiciary during this public meeting had a partnership agreement with the bank to set up a production unit, which he filed a lawsuit after having problems with his contract party; After his petition was rejected in the primary and appeals authorities, this person requested the application of Article 477; After studying the said case, the judge ordered the relevant judicial official in the form of a letter to conduct a special inspection on the matter before carrying out the process related to the acceptance of Article 477 and to examine it carefully.

During this public meeting, one of the visitors who was from Khuzestan and Shekat was considered to be a multi-plaintiff case, stated that as a result of the said case going back and forth between the court and the investigation for four years, the names of several people from Shekat have been removed from the case. ; After hearing and reviewing the case, the Head of the Judiciary, in the Majlis, contacted Dehghani, the Chief Justice of Khuzestan province, followed up on the issue and issued the necessary orders to deal with it quickly, and addressed the Chief Justice of Khuzestan and said: Naturally Dealing with this case with these dimensions should not last for four years.

During today’s public meeting, Dehghani, Chief Justice of Khuzestan, after following up on the issue, during a call with the head of the judiciary, explained the dimensions and details of this case to the head of the judiciary. After listening to these explanations, the judge emphasized: it is clear from the explanations provided, that the monitoring time has just been set for the case in question, which should not be the case; However, we must accept that our judicial colleagues have been negligent in this matter and it is necessary to follow up on this negligent act; Also, it should be specified precisely which complaints have been removed from the file.

In the continuation of this public meeting, a citizen from Khomeinishahr claimed that the proceedings in his case were delayed; A case whose content was related to property dispute and forgery; In this regard, the head of the judicial system contacted the judicial authority of Isfahan province and issued an order for immediate investigation and follow-up. With the follow-up of the relevant provincial authority, it became clear that the main reason for the delay in the proceedings in the said case was the plaintiff’s own actions, who initially abandoned his complaint in the prosecutor’s office, and then, when he raised another claim regarding the aggressive seizure of his property, he avoided cooperating with the judicial expert. did it

In the continuation of the public meeting of the head of the judiciary, a person who introduced himself as the representative of the plaintiff in the multi-plaintiff case of the “Aftab Ray” project, stated the details of this case and claimed that the sentence enforcement unit does not pay due attention to determining the property of the fraudster. And this is in the situation that the said property pays off the debts of the Masharaliyyah to the plaintiffs of the case; After giving the explanations of this client, the judge called the head of Shahrari Justice and inquired about the matter; With the explanations provided by this judicial official, it was found that the property of the fraudster in this case was put up for auction in two stages, but it was not sold, and in this regard, there was no negligence on the part of the enforcement unit. In addition, the highest sentence of legal conviction has been determined for the fraudster in the said case; In the following, the head of the judiciary gave expert guidance to this client to speed up the achievement of Shakat’s demands.

Another multi-complaint case brought up during this public meeting was a case related to Farhangian Housing Cooperative in one of the regions of Tehran province. The referring person was one of the initial suspects of the case, who had assumed responsibility in the same cooperative after the conviction of the former official of the cooperative. After stating the details of the case, this client stated that the documents of the case were lost in the relevant investigation branch and the copies of these documents were also lost after some time; In the following, the head of the judiciary asked questions about the dimensions and details of this case to the referring person, and it was found that this person accepted responsibility in this cooperative without any authority and claimed that he was unaware of the amount of deposits and receipts in the cooperative account; In order to speed up the process of dealing with this case, the judge issued orders to the Chief Justice of Tehran Province and said to the referring person: If your claim that the documents of this case are missing is true, then with the culprits. will be dealt with.

Car fraud with 160 lost property was the issue raised by one of the applicants to the head of the judiciary. This person stated that the plaintiffs in the case are unaware of the proceedings; After listening to the content of the complainant and examining and studying the case and determining that it is in the execution stage, the head of the judiciary told the referring person that he will receive a report from the relevant judicial unit on the outcome of the verdict issued in your case.

*Direct and unmediated connection with the text of the people is one of the main approaches of Hojjatul-Islam wal-Muslimin Mohseni Ajeei, and his management approach during the period since his appointment to the position of head of the judiciary confirms his full belief and respect for the establishment of direct and unmediated communication with the people and Refers to the judicial system and listens to their opinions and problems closely.

In addition to the fact that the head of the judiciary is personally bound to include public meetings in his work plans, in numerous positions and speeches, he has tasked the officials and officials of the judicial system in the center and provinces to pay attention to holding continuous public meetings.

Public meetings of the head of the judiciary are also held in various forms; Among them, public meetings during provincial trips, field visits to judicial authorities and centers, as well as direct and unmediated meetings with those referring to the public relations department of the judiciary, as well as attendance at mosques and unmediated meetings with people.