Legal and judicialsocial

Mohseni Ajaei’s emphasis on expanding relations between Iran and Indonesia


According to the Fars news agency, citing the media center of the Judiciary, Hojjatul Islam Mohseni Ajei, today Wednesday (16 Shahrivar) met with the President of the Supreme Court of Indonesia, Mohammad Sharifuddin, the highest judicial official of this Islamic country, and his accompanying delegation, at the Judiciary Headquarters. did

In this meeting, the head of the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran, while thanking the judiciary and the Indonesian government, who have provided good assistance and significant cooperation with the Islamic Republic of Iran in international forums in recent years, said: Indonesia and Iran have been in communication for more than 70 years. They are good with each other, but these relations have been much wider and at the highest levels of the two countries in recent years.

The Head of the Judiciary stated: The visit of the President of Iran to Indonesia, as well as the visit of the President of Indonesia to Iran, along with the visits of presidents and parliamentarians, as well as officials of the judiciary, foreign ministers and other working groups, have been very effective in linking these two great Islamic countries over the past years. Is.

Referring to the agreements that have been reached in recent years in the legal and judicial fields of the two countries of Iran and Indonesia, as well as in the cultural, economic, scientific and technological fields, the head of the judiciary expressed hope that the measures related to the full implementation of these agreements will be finalized as soon as possible. to be

Hojjat-ul-Islam Mohseni Ajei said that Iran and Indonesia can properly introduce the merciful and dear face of Islam to the world and said: Indonesia as the most populous Muslim country in the world and Iran as a country that occupies a significant position in the West Asian region and the world. they can have wide communication with each other on various issues and introduce dear Islam to the world as it is and prevent distortions and the image that extremists present of Islam.

He clarified: Today, the dominant and extremist currents are trying to present a different face of Islam and the Prophet of Islam to the world, and under different titles, they are trying to ignore the rights of Muslims and attack Islam and Muslims.

Referring to the decades-long crimes committed by the Zionists against the Palestinian people, the Head of the Judiciary stated: The Muslim people of Palestine have been under the oppression of the Zionists for about 70 years and are not allowed to make their own decisions and form their desired country. Unfortunately, in the last one or two years, some Arab countries have tried to normalize their relations with the Zionists and Israel.

The Head of the Judiciary stated: It is natural that all Muslims have a duty against the atrocities against Muslims.

The head of the judicial system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the continuation of his speech in this meeting, also pointed out the common ground with the head of the Supreme Court of Indonesia in going through all levels of the judicial structure of the two countries.

Hojjat-ul-Islam Mohseni Ajeei, referring to the differences between the judicial system of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the judicial authorities of many countries, stated: In the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, special conditions have been determined for the head of the judiciary, one of which is that when the head of the judicial system He is elected by the Supreme Leader, the rest of the appointments in the judiciary are made by the head of the judiciary, and the parliament and the government do not have any interference in the selection of supreme judges, court judges and other judges.

He went on to describe and explain the responsibilities and functions of some organizations and judicial structures in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the Inspection Organization, the Real Estate Registration Organization, the Prisons Organization, and the Judicial Organization of the Armed Forces.

Referring to the development of the use of modern technologies in Iran’s judicial authorities and centers, the head of the judiciary said: The judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran has tried to make the most of modern and smart technologies in terms of the diversity of its missions in recent years. Currently, electronic government in Iran is progressing and we are trying to fully connect all systems to each other; Accordingly, the government and judiciary systems are currently being connected.

Stating that many judicial issues in Iran are handled through electronic systems, the Head of the Judiciary said: Currently, more than 95% of the judicial decisions issued in Iran are announced to the people electronically, and there is no need for people to be physically present in the courts. It is not judicial.

Pointing to the development of providing electronic services to prisoners, the judge said: “With smartness and the measures taken, the prisoner communicates with the court via audio and video from inside the prison without being sent to the court, and this issue is being developed. is to find Also, arrangements for electronic and video meeting of the prisoner with his family members are also available in Iran.

Referring to the progress made in Iran in the field of criminal identification by using knowledge-based capacities, Hojjat-ul-Islam Mohseni Ajeei said: “Using new technologies and knowledge-based capacities to shorten many judicial processes in order to provide better services to the people is an important and reliable principle.”

The Head of the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran continued by referring to the model of religious democracy in Islamic Iran and the popular nature of the Islamic Republic’s system and stated: We try to use the capacities of the people as much as possible in all issues, including executive, judicial and legislative issues. and resolve issues with people’s participation and thinking.

Explaining the philosophy of existence and the process of formation of dispute resolution councils in Iran under the judicial system, the head of the judicial system said: In dispute resolution councils, the basis of work is to resolve the differences of different classes and classes of people by relying on the capacities of the people themselves and in a non-judicial and peace-based way. And compromise. This method is both less expensive and has better results; In recent years, in many cases of murder, the parents’ consent has been obtained in this way.

Hojjat-ul-Islam Mohseni Ajei continued by emphasizing the necessity of developing judicial diplomacy and stating that Iran and Indonesia, as two Islamic countries, can transfer their judicial experiences to each other. “, “Using People’s Capacities” as well as “issuing Islamic rulings” and we can also form working groups between the judicial authorities of the two countries and reach solutions in judicial matters.

Referring to the importance of concluding an agreement on the transfer of convicts between Iran and Indonesia, the head of the judiciary said: Currently, more than 40 Iranian prisoners are serving their time in Indonesia. This is due to the fact that Iran and Indonesia do not have an agreement regarding the transfer of convicts, and if an agreement can be concluded in this regard, it would be very desirable. This issue is an important help to the families of these prisoners and it is also considered a help for the prisoner himself.

The Head of the Judiciary went on to raise questions to the President of the Supreme Court of Indonesia regarding issues such as the duties and missions of the Religious Court in Indonesia, as well as how to deal with the crime of sacrilege and its punishment, and those who insult the Holy Prophet of Islam, and “Mohammed Sharifuddin” The highest judicial authority of Indonesia replied: Since Indonesia is the most populous Islamic country, it deals with issues related to Muslim families, heirs, marriage, Sharia economy, etc. in the religious court. Also, the desecration of the sacred space of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) is considered a crime and will be dealt with in the public court.

The President of the Supreme Court of Indonesia also responded to the proposal of the head of the Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran to conclude an agreement on the transfer of convicts. We can develop relations and thus fill judicial gaps.

“Mohammed Sharifuddin”, the highest judicial official of Indonesia, also praised the progress of the judicial system of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the development of the intelligentization of judicial affairs and the use of knowledge-based capacities in the judiciary, and pointed out the achievements of the Indonesian judicial system in the field of using modern technologies and knowledge-based talents. And he said: The judicial system in Indonesia is based on knowledge-based capacities and has made important and vast achievements in this field.

At the same time, the President of the Supreme Court of Indonesia called for cooperation with Iran and exchange and modeling of our country’s judicial system in these fields.

The President of the Supreme Court of Indonesia, while pointing out the remarkable independence of the judicial system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, invited Hojjat-ul-Islam Wal-Muslimin Mohseni Ajei to visit Indonesia.

end of message/


Leave a Reply

Back to top button