According to the Tasnim news agency and quoted from the official website of the Football Federation, about the appeal of the Tractor Club by Hossein Alizadeh against the decision of the Committee on the Status of the Players of the Football Federation, according to which the ruling sentenced the appellant to pay five billion and 568 million Rials for the claims arising from the contract On November 12, 2019, and the court fee was issued to the defendant’s right to appeal, according to the total content of the case and the arguments listed in the issued title, the objection and effective objection that would harm the protesting document was not implemented and documented in Article 17 The procedure of the Football Federation Players Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, the petition is confirmed and announced. This vote is final.
* Regarding the appeal of Mes Kerman Club by Hamid Taherifard regarding the decision of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the verdict was sentencing the appellant to pay 2 billion 33 million 160 thousand Rials for the appellant’s claims against the contract of 23 September 2010 and the legal fees The defendant’s appeal was issued, according to the total content of the case and the arguments contained in the issued decision, the effective objection and objection that would harm the protesting document was not implemented and documented in Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection. , the document is confirmed and announced. This vote is final.
* Regarding Tractor Club’s appeal by Reza Dehghani regarding the decision of the Football Federation’s players’ status committee, according to which the ruling sentenced the appellant to pay 15 billion and 30 million Rials for the remaining salary of the player according to the contract of November 16, 1401 and the cost of the appeal. The respondent was issued, according to the total contents of the case and the arguments contained in the issued head, objections and effective objections that would damage the petition filed against him, were not implemented and documented in Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee on the Status of Players of the Football Federation, while rejecting the objections. The document is confirmed and announced. This vote is final.
* Regarding the appeal of Sepahan Club of Isfahan to the side of Esteghlal Club of Tehran regarding the decision of the Committee on the Status of Players of the Football Federation, according to which the judgment was issued that the appellant was not entitled to claim compensation for the registration of the contract with the player (Mohammed Mohebi) based on Article 21 of the RSTP, with regard Based on the total contents of the case and the arguments listed in the issued header, the objection and the effective objection that would harm the petition filed against it were not implemented and based on Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee on the Status of Football Federation Players, while rejecting the objection, the petition is confirmed and announced objectively. . This vote is final.
* Regarding the appeal of Sepahan Club of Isfahan against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee of the Football Federation, according to which the verdict was sentencing the appellant to pay 510 million rials for the violations of the spectators in the match against Esteghlal of Tehran, which involved throwing bottles at the opposing spectators and throwing firecrackers and firecrackers, with Considering the total contents of the case and the arguments listed in the issued header, the objection and the effective objection that does not affect the protester’s petition has not been implemented, and it is confirmed and announced that it has been issued in accordance with Article 106 of the disciplinary regulations of the Football Federation while rejecting the objection. The decision is final.
* Regarding Persepolis Club’s appeal by Aria Barzegar against the decision of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, according to which the decision to reject the appellant’s claim for the amount of 2 billion Rials and legal fees was issued based on the agreement on April 17, 1401, with regard to the total The contents of the case and the arguments contained in the issued decision, objections and effective objections that would damage the petition against it, were not implemented, and in accordance with Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure of the Football Federation Players’ Status Committee, while rejecting the objection, the petition is issued and confirmed and announced. . This vote is final.