The “angle” of the Fajr decade holds a debate / a series of conversations on the subject of revolution

According to Fars News Agency, in these special programs, issues related to the event of the Islamic Revolution will be analyzed from the perspective of humanities thinkers.

Special “angle” programs will examine the historical, cultural and social conditions of the revolutionary period with topics such as the ideal of the revolution, the idea of ​​the revolution, the world of the revolution and the law of the revolution.

It will also critique the course of the revolution to this day and, by representing the course of the Islamic Revolution from its inception to the present, will present a new image for researchers in the humanities.

In this series, we will talk about the future of the Islamic Revolution and ask professors of humanities questions about the relationship between the world and the Iranian revolution, the man who nurtured the idea of ​​revolution and the man who determined the revolution, the aspirations of the people during the revolution and the lawless capacities. Basic, we will ask.

In the special corner programs that will be held with the presence of a guest, professors of humanities such as Dr. Parsania, Dr. Ismaili, Dr. Mottaqi and Dr. Azad will be present.

Therefore, the report, the first part of the special program of the Fajr Decade of Zavieh in a conversation with Mohammad Reza Javadi Yeganeh, sociologist and faculty member of the University of Tehran, deals with the people and the revolution.
What does revolution mean? Is it a historical event? What is the result of this view in relation to people? Is it a continuous flow? What is the result of this view in relation to people?

What does “people” mean when we say that? Can we have different meanings of people in mind or is there a single interpretation of it?
Has the meaning of people in the history of the revolution been a fixed concept or has it changed historically? What was the origin of this historical change in the meaning and – consequently – in the case of the people? What were the results of this semantic transformation?
What is the relationship between the people and the revolution?
People for revolution or revolution for people?
Revolution or people? Which is more important in the scales? Which should be ignored in favor of another? !!
What attitude towards the people and the revolution and the relationship between them can guarantee the future of the people and the revolution?
“Zavieh” is a work of the Religious Culture and Thought Group of the Chahar Sima Network.

End of message /

You can edit this post