The issue of hijab in the meaning-making war – Mehr news agency Iran and world’s news
According to Mehr News Agency, Seyyed Abdul Rasool Alam Al-Hadi, a researcher and researcher in a note about the issue of hijab Stated: When a social phenomenon finds a correlation or causal relationship in relation to different phenomena, it has a problem Mandy It can be done and it can no longer be faced with old and linear solutions.
Today, hijab has faced challenges along four phenomena that cause problems Mandy It is. All four phenomena can be analyzed in terms of cultural context or new world conditions or inaccessible external factors, but their interference with each other causes Cheghar Hijab has become the norm in today’s Iran.
First, the sexual revolution in the world; What has happened since the sexual revolution in the West between 1920 and 1960 AD has spread to all countries with the flow of development and caused a change not only in sexual behavior but also in identity. search It has also challenged gender. Many legal and political issues surrounding the sexual revolution with come to recognize homosexuality In civil law, existence club Hi Special and the possibility of free relationship are among them.
In Iran, like all the countries of the world, although there are news under the skin of the city, but the mandatory law of covering has prevented the entry of sexual revolution, the value of modesty and chastity in the survey of the attitudes of Iranians (2014) has shown that such a revolution did not occur in the country.
Second, globalization and culture; The process of modernization and globalization has caused deep transformations in the life and identity and value changes of societies, so that people distance themselves from the sources of traditional identity building and turn to new ways of life and even thinking about their own identity, causing redefining of people and doubting the historical record. It has become for itself. Giddens (1378) considers the current rethinking to be aimed at the future and global values. Of course, the values that follow in the course of the powerful construction of modern civilization such as individualism, utilitarianism, dramatization and recreation of life.
Therefore, the hijab, which is social and unattractive and prevents laabali Gary Pleasure is definable and will be challenging in the process of globalization. In other words, hijab is in conflict with the importance of finding lifestyle and individual will in the new era so that Civilized and social conditions consider covering as an individual matter, but hijab is placed in an individual dispute in relation to social norms. Individual according to choice Gary In his lifestyle, he cannot accept social norms, and in this conflict, he becomes violent with the surrounding society.
Third, the political confrontation with hijab; There has been a sense of saturation of inefficiency of solutions around the issue of hijab for the officials and cultural managers of the country so that They no longer follow the possibility of solving the problem in complex conditions and prefer to refer to other sectors such as justice and economy. In addition, the hijab becomes a hostage in a political fight between factions in the elections. To so that To get more votes, the title “freedom for women” is defined precisely in relation to social policies around the hijab, and governments make promises to women in order to access more freedoms or reduce police approaches.
Fourth, war meaning making in mentalities; The enemy’s intervention in the riots of the fall of 1401 showed that the issue of women and hijab is reflected in a cognitive fight in the duality of personal matter-social matter in the society. Also as hijab American politician Either the moral matter, the hijab is the desire of the government or the people, the hijab is in line with women’s freedoms or the wishes of men, the hijab as a traditional thing or a modern thing is regularly taken into consideration.
With a simple content analysis, the enemy’s cognitive structure can be deduced. Therefore, his interpretation of the hijab in Iran is that “the hijab is an individual matter that the patriarchal rule of the Islamic Republic of Iran has forced to prevent the growth and development of women, so that women are captives in the hands of men.”
It seems like a cognitive war on the issue of the main hijab the most And it has become the newest phenomenon in its complexity. In this way, people pay attention to the value of modesty and chastity and consider the hijab as a necessary moral behavior in the public view, but they will oppose the government’s intervention in its preservation and development (survey by the Radio and Television Research Center, summer 1401). The formulation of the enemy of hijab is also followed in the reading of some university professors, journalists, social elites and domestic figures, which causes getting lost More to understand the logic of hijab.
If the ruling of hijab is for the presence of women outside of privacy and home, then it is no longer an individual matter, but it is a social matter for women’s activities and public movement.
On the other hand, if the hijab is to maintain gender stereotypes, then by the way, it provides him with the possibility of maintaining his dignity, and this is against the modern view of the freedom of men’s lust, so how can the hijab be considered men’s desire! In addition, the current experience of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the participation of 64% of women in university studies, women’s championship sports in world competitions such as the Olympics, the presence of women in political seats, economic activities and business by women can be considered as preventing the growth of women. The main reading of the Islamic Republic of Iran regarding the hijab is that “the hijab frees women from captivity in the lustful eyes of men and is a blessing from God to preserve their dignity.” Hijab is a command for women to move socially in sync with their families.