The most ineffective governmental centers are opinion polling centers – Mehr News Agency Iran and world’s news
Mehr news agency _ religion group and Andishe – Samaneh Nourizadeh Qasri: Review meeting “Aspect Hi “Individual and social hijab in society” was held with the presence of Ebrahim Fayaz, professor of Tehran University and sociologist and Hojjat al-Islam Jalil Mohebi, with the performance of Mohammad Hossein Badri and hosted by Mehr news agency.
Ebrahim Fayaz said at the beginning that hijab is a social and biological phenomenon: the problem of Iran and the world in the modern period was that it separated culture from instinct, while instinct is the basis of culture.
He went on to explain that this problem has been created in the whole world and continued: The mediators of modernity and thought have disappeared. In the post-modern period, this story became serious and we can say that the whole world is in a chaotic situation Oh you we saw
Fayaz emphasized: “The return to God has started in the world and the sign of that is the existence of meaning among people, and the next stage is time.” We need to understand the philosophical structure and understand where this world is going and where we are in the world in order to reach the sexual culture in the sense of hijab as part of this structure.
Looking at the sexual situation of other countries, this professor of Tehran University said: We think that in Europe or other countries that produce many sexual films, all issues are sexual, but it is the opposite, that is, in a place where there are no sexual issues, sexual issues are discussed in the cinema. In a place similar to the United States of America, people are strictly veiled and religious. But when we see their media, we think that sexual issues are very important there, but this is not the case, or in Catholic countries like Italy and France, family is very important among people. But the structure of their media tends to dominate sexual issues.
He continued: In the world, there are two debates in the dimension of anthropology. Whether we to humanism and Subjectivism (Subjectivism) we go or we go towards people and family. There is a war between these two. People of the world are looking for family and global justice and vice versa Judaism And SubjectivismIt considers deconstruction, humanism, nudity and homosexuality. Currently, the world has returned to instinct and made it the basis of culture and the extreme aspect Subjectivity It becomes the same corruption that we see now when women are mentioned as honor condemnation It is possible and he does not consider a woman honorable.
Fayaz said: “If postmodernism would have been discussed accurately, many of the mistakes we are witnessing today would not have happened.” These issues should be addressed in the media. In the body of radio and television, there are those who do not allow media to be ahead of communication.
Pointing out that three discourses govern radio and television productions, Fayaz said: Marxism, sophism And populism dominates radio and television outputs. The lack of meaning in the society has greatly increased, which is due to anti-media and improper functioning of radio and television. This lack of meaning is filled with social crisis, which has no result except killing and killing, and we are witnessing what is happening on the street floor. If so, the problem Shah-Cheragh It would not have happened in Shiraz that a killer robot called a human would cause such a disaster.
Emphasizing that the recent events lead to the growth and flourishing of new meanings and concepts at the society level, he added: When we do not deal with issues scientifically, unfortunately these issues find their way to the square and the street. That is, instead of solving these conflicts in the university, it finds its way to the streets.
In the continuation of this meeting, Hojjat-ul-Islam Jalil Mohebi discussed the role of the government and the executive and decision-making apparatus in these issues and said: “We have the constitution. Oh you We have that it is based on a draft prepared by lawyers. this ago the writer It was put on the agenda and approved with the changes that were applied. One of these changes was the issue of religious authority and the theory of how to manage society.
Mohibi: Lack of work the most Governing centers, thought centers measurement They are exactly when we need to know how people think
He asked the question that how does human instinct reach decision and governance when faced with social issues? He continued: The person who is currently considered as an informed jurist in the Constitution is only in the Guardian Council veto has it. Our laws have a problem because someone who Theorsin instead of being effective at the beginning of the legislative process, it sits at the end of the law process and decides whether a law is Shariah or not. get he does. The continuous ijtihad of the jurists of Jame al-Shari’at for governance was one of the cases mentioned in the constitution, and some of the decisions of Imam Khomeini (RA) in the first ten years of the revolution, such as the Council for the Expediency of the System, were made based on this, or fatwas, which had no precedent in the history of jurisprudence. , like a fatwa solution Chess with the loss of gambling in chess or regarding the jurisdiction of family courts regarding divorce.
The rulings of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution are not even in the law
Hojjat al-Islam Mohibi emphasized that councils were formed with the planning of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution to eliminate this deficiency of policy making in the constitution in new areas, and continued: The Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution and the Supreme Council of Cyber Space were the product of this thinking in the field of policy making. Thirty years after the establishment of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, we see that this council has not been successful, while another council called the Strategic Council of Foreign Policy was created, which was successful and had a proportionate output. In terms of policy-making in the field of culture, the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution was not a successful institution and its rulings are not even in the form of law. Circulars are also issued in various other centers, such as the Headquarters for Prohibition of Good and Prohibition of Prohibition, Organization of Islamic Propaganda, Radio and Television, none of which reach a single point, that is, different people with different views and tastes make different decisions that achieve a specific goal in our policy making. does not follow
Emphasizing that the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution and all cultural institutions should consider man as a being established in the society from the beginning, Mohebi said: There is a narration from Amirul Momineen (AS) that this narration is one of the most basic topics of sociology. They say: When the new breath gains its strength, it sits in one place and becomes established. Strength here does not mean livelihood, but means all human needs.
Pointing out that today’s youths have not met their needs, it is not possible to talk with them, he said: the needs of today’s youth are not defined for them from the outside, but they are defined and expressed by themselves. Either their need should be solved or it should be called a wrong need and the young people should be informed about its wrongness so that their acceptance will happen. In the film that the late Sarina Ismailzadeh took a few minutes of herself, she talks about the needs of a 16-year-old girl. When we listen to her, we cannot analyze her words with the analysis of the sixties girl. Today’s teenager is such that either his needs should be met or his needs should be met by talking about that need and correcting it. We can’t get rid of hunger when we recognize the instinct and meet the needs of the instinct accordingly.
The former secretary of the Headquarters for Good and Prohibition of Evil stated: We are in a period where events and changes have occurred in our country. The presence of women in the society was taking shape since the last 150 years, the Baha’is pumped this issue at the same time and this continued until the tyranny of Saghir, the period of the discovery of the hijab and after that the statements of Imam Khomeini (RA) at the beginning of the movement. islamic After that, it reached the period of familylessness, that is, the Farah Pahlavi Foundation decided that the foundation and roots of the family in Iran should be laid, and in the supporting documents of the Family Protection Law before the revolution, it is stated that the laws of family dissolution are not applicable in the society at present. But we approve that the culture to destroy the family is implemented and started in the society under the name of family protection.
He continued: We have a society where there are different people, from extreme modern radical people to people who do not believe in modern structures. He is a student or a traditional person who does not accept the modern government, and on the other hand, we have people who consider the society to be modern. This society has different people and thoughts, and some of our officials do not think that we have people who each have needs, while we did not recognize those needs.
Emphasizing on the clear and precise recognition of minds at this stage of the country’s crisis, Mohebi said: The least efficient governmental centers are opinion polling centers, that is exactly when we need to know how people think. It is only during elections that these centers have special activities continuously. Some opinion polling centers did not have any orders to observe the minds of the Iranian society during this time when the society is facing challenges. Currently, we are dealing with mental illusions about the society, not with what happened in reality. Society cannot be managed with these illusions.
Fayaz: Monotheism without installments becomes ISIS
Ebrahim Fayaz further pointed to a battle in the field of social sciences between comfort and peace and said: The leftists believe in atheistic mysticism and Mulla Sadra also proposes peace without comfort. Mulla Sadra proposes peace without comfort and instinct satisfaction, which is monasticism. Now some comforts are rejected. The result of peace without comfort is the existence of the capitalists who create the billionaire aristocracy with trickery.
He continued: There are two or three verses in the Qur’an that are used as a basis. It is stated in Surah Al-Imran: “The witness of God is that there is no god but He and the angels, and the first of all the knowledgeable ones who are in charge. There is no God but He. We know that there is no God but He.” If a society that is “witness of Allah” reaches “Qaimabal al-Qast” then it will reach a monotheistic society. Monotheism has no meaning without payment and comfort. How many books do we have about installments? Undivided monotheism results in a classless monotheistic society of the Mojahedin Khalq (hypocrites).
This professor of Tehran University added: “Peace without comfort, in line with the views of Mulla Sadra and Ibn Arabi, is such that a small class of elites is at the top and the rest are miserable and poor.”
Emphasizing that the basis of Islam is comfort first and then peace, Fayaz said: In the debates, all these justice-oriented verses have been shut down and only the mystical aspect of the Quranic verses has been taken into consideration. We have to ask where is the comfort of installments in Islamic social philosophy?
Fayaz continued: We cover the end of the structure that we don’t know what it is. Although before the hijab, chastity is mentioned and before that the family, which is defined as a legitimate social institution, is the satisfaction of the sexual instinct. We call this family aristocratic. According to the same thinking, the poor and socially backward must borrow to be able to get dowry. In fact, the mystical society is hypocritical, aristocratic, sexually obscene and hypocritical. We do not have a dictatorship when we talk about installments. Amir al-Mominin (AS) says in Nahj al-Balagha: “An installment without piety is a dictatorship.” An installment without piety is a dictatorship of Marxism and Communism.
Unreserved piety is a socialist fantasy
Professor of Sociology of Tehran University stated: If there is piety, the work of the society will not lead to such conditions. Unreserved piety is a socialist fantasy. In a country that does not hold scientific discussions, it is not possible to enlighten the minds of teenagers.
Emphasizing that the entire crisis of the country revolves around the two axes of the cognitive-knowledge system and the sex system, he continued: If these two axes were mixed together, we would not face such challenges. Everyone says cognitive war, but everyone is engaged in cognitive operations. Sexual self-awareness has been revealed in the cognitive education system and sexual system, no one can expect scientific growth from the elite of Sharif University but not accept their awareness and growth in the field of sex.
Jalil Mohebi: Today we need Imam Musa Sadri so that he can talk to the society
In the continuation of Hojjat al-Islam, Jalil Mohebi, regarding the issues related to mysticism and raised in Ibrahim Fayaz’s speech, said: When we look at the students of Ayatollah Qazi, we do not see signs of socialism and governance. But when we look at Imam, this is not the case. The Imam of the verse “Say: I praise you in one.” May you fear Allah, the Most Merciful and the One” are expressed in this regard. From the point of view of mystical philosophy, when we look at these two people, we see their marriages close together. Imam Khomeini speaks a new social message from an individual mystical school. This jurisprudence of the Imam has been able to distinguish it from the jurisprudence of other jurisprudents. I believe that Imam Khomeini was not a philosopher, jurist or mystic alone. He is a school that includes everyone.
He continued: Our legal system is the system of jurist and jurist is the one who knows the society. The relationship between the decision-making system and science is being cut off. Not the science that the professor studied in Europe and America, not the one who only studied the subject, but the knowledge that can show their results in the society. Today we need Imam Musa Sadri so that he can talk to the society.
At the end of the meeting, Ebrahim Fayaz summed up and said: If we have a global dialogue in the form of Islamic words based on wisdom and nature, all these discussions will come together, but neither the centers in Qom work on this issue, nor the universities.