The Swedish prosecutor’s irrational answers to Nouri’s lawyers’ questions
According to Fars news agency’s judicial group, the 12th session of Hamid Nouri’s appeal court was held in Sweden on Monday, June 19.
Recently, Hamid Nouri’s defense attorneys submitted questions to the court for the Swedish prosecutor to answer these questions.
In the first part of this court session, the prosecutor answered very briefly and in a few minutes some of these questions that were presented by Hamid Nouri’s lawyers on June 19.
The situation of Hamid Nouri’s detention in solitary confinement, refusal to provide ophthalmology services and replacement of glasses, interruption of meeting and contact with his family and Iranian lawyer for a long time, and the recording and destruction of Hamid Nouri’s notes in the detention center were among the questions raised.
Prosecutor: We will not answer some questions
By simply passing some of the questions, the prosecutor just said: We will not answer some of the questions.
While Hamid Nouri has spent nearly 4 years in detention and during this time his eyesight has become weak, one of Hamid Nouri’s requests has been to see an ophthalmologist and change his glasses, and despite this, this request is always met with an answer. The detention center has faced negatives.
In his statement today, the prosecutor made a strange claim and claimed that “a request to change glasses is not considered a prison medical service!”
The issue of deceiving Hamid Nouri and dragging him to Sweden is one of the other issues that challenge the nature of his trial, and despite this, the prosecutor uses vague terms such as “it was not like this”.
The Swedish prosecutor claimed: Regarding the fact that Hamid Nouri was deceived, in our opinion, Nouri came to Sweden voluntarily and no one asked the Swedish government and system to bring him here.
Violation of the claims of the main plaintiff in the case
This claim of the Swedish prosecutor comes while “Iraj Masadaghi”, one of the main plaintiffs in this case, has previously spoken about a plan to drag Hamid Nouri to Sweden and the trap that was set for him.
The story of the Swedish police officer’s secret presence in the case and the prosecutor’s response
Recently, it was revealed in a Swedish TV documentary that an Iranian police officer of Swedish origin was secretly present in the investigation of the case from the beginning.
This action, which was done without any information from Hamid Nouri’s defense lawyers, could have a serious impact on the case process, but the prosecutor answered this issue in just a few sentences without the slightest hint that this was a widespread violation of the law: Regarding the police officer who was involved in the investigation participated, he wrote a note about his actions and is supposed to explain what actions he did; He should also explain about the calls he had with Hamid Nouri and how he met him during his arrest and what were his reasons for doing this and the connection that the police officer personally has to this case.
Denial of facts
During the recent years, the authorities of the detention center have always tried to destroy and record Hamid Nouri’s notes, which practically deprived him of the possibility of an effective defense; In response to this complaint, the Swedish prosecutor denied the whole issue and claimed that he had all the packages and supplies that Hamid Nouri needed, and he did not have this free access for only 22 days in May. .
The second part of the court and the statements of Hamid Nouri’s lawyers
In the second part of the “Thomas Bodström” trial, Hamid Nouri’s lawyer challenged the claims made by the Swedish prosecutor in the first part of the trial.
“Bodström” stressed the fact that despite the permission to visit, it was not implemented by the detention center.
Detention center’s refusal to carry out orders
This Swedish lawyer said: permission has been given regarding meetings, but it has not been implemented properly; In the same way, the Iranian lawyer has not been allowed to meet; Issuing a permit is different from meeting and they did not allow the meeting to be held.
Rejecting the statements of the Swedish prosecutor who claimed that Hamid Nouri’s access was limited only in May, “Bodstrom” said: Regarding the access to the materials, it should be said that in addition to May, the materials were already taken from Hamid Nouri.
He stated: They destroyed all the materials that Hamid Nouri should have access to and this is an important point.
Solitary confinement for the fourth summer
Hamid Nouri’s detention in solitary confinement is a matter that even the Swedish media mentions as a record in Swedish history, and the prosecutor of this country tried to deny this fact in his statements.
Regarding this issue, “Bodstrom” said: “Individual issue is important; They have kept Hamid Nouri in solitary confinement for 4 summers and this is important.
Lawyer Hamid Nouri emphasized once again that “referring to an ophthalmologist is a part of medical services, and at this age (when the eye score changes), he was not allowed to see an ophthalmologist for 3.5 years.”
Contradictions in witness statements
The selection of witnesses in Hamid Nouri’s trial case and the contradictions that can be seen in the statements of these people are among the issues that have been fundamentally criticized and despite this, the prosecutor has not made an effort to resolve the doubts and contradictions.
Contradictions in witnesses’ statements can be examined from different dimensions; On the one hand, there are many differences in the statements of these people, and on the other hand, there is no consistency between the statements of some witnesses before Hamid Nouri’s arrest and what these people presented in the trial court.
In today’s meeting, this contradiction about the witnesses and their statements continued; In the first part of the court, the prosecutor mentioned a number of witnesses and presented their alleged narratives about Hamid Nouri.
In another part, Swedish lawyer Hamid Nouri, referring to the prosecutor’s naming of these people, said: “The prosecutor spoke about 15 witnesses, and what the appeals court should know now is what these people have said before in other cases.” ? In many cases, “Hamid Abbasi” or Hamid Nouri have not been named; Note what these people said in the trial court.
According to him, 91 people did not name Abbasi and only one person mentioned him. This person didn’t know anything about this from the beginning and only mentioned “Abbasi” after reading the book “Iraj Masadaghi”. One of the witnesses in the trial court changed the names and put the name of “Hamid Abbasi” instead of another person’s name.
Next, Hana Larson, Hamid Nouri’s other lawyer, raised objections regarding some witnesses whose names were mentioned during the trial and also their statements.
“Larson” says that some of these people did not mention Hamid Nouri’s name before, but after the arrest of Hamid Nouri, they mentioned his name.
Lawyer Hamid Nouri points out that there are contradictions in the statements of some witnesses before the court and what they said in the trial court.
“Hannah Larson” continues to draw the court’s attention to the differences between the descriptions that some witnesses have given about Hamid Nouri and says that there are many differences in the descriptions of Hamid Nouri’s appearance. For example, one person described him as a “dresser” who never wore a uniform, but another person described him as a person who always wore a uniform.
Hamid Nouri’s lawyers have repeatedly raised the issue that it is not possible to prove that Nouri “killed someone” in this case.
“Thomas Bodström” once again said: “None of these people can prove that Hamid Nouri killed someone.”
In another part, “Bodström” asked the Swedish prosecutor to provide a written answer to the recently raised questions.
According to lawyer Hamid Nouri, the next court session will be the description of the events of September 1 (10 September) and September 4 (13 September) is also the hearing.
end of message/