What weakens people’s religion is liberal thinking, not jurisprudential thinking – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news
According to the reporter of Mehr, Hojjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Mahdi Ahadi, the professor of Qom seminary, at the beginning of his lesson on principles in Faiziyah school of Qom, referring to the effective role of the clergy in the security of the society and the leadership of the jurist in the upliftment of the Islamic Ummah and criticizing the thinking of the non-interference of the scholars in The government said: “Unfortunately, the theory of non-interference of jurists and scholars in the government has returned, and some professors of the field have collaborated with some university professors, and they put forward this theory every day and claim authority, and mostly you know who they are and they say that if the people of Religion is coming back because the government is in the hands of scholars!
He continued: If the scholars do the work of their mosque and do not have a hand in the government, the people’s religion is healthy! They almost think that the role of scholars is not the role of subjectivity, but the role of ability! No, it is not like that, the role of the scholars is the role of tahsil, and the role of the scholars is that of supplication, whether they want the government to be in their hands or not, the scholars present incentives and create motivation.
What thinking has made people religious?
Hojjat al-Islam wa al-Muslamin Ahudi, asking whether religion with liberal thinking remains stable, said: The first question I have as a student, both in the university and in the seminary, and I have asked before is whether religion with liberal thinking Will it remain stable?! Don’t you think that liberal thinking along with the scholars has caused people to lose religion! And otherwise, the scholars are very successful minus the liberal thinking! This is the extent of their success that the enemies of the revolution gave some countries in the region the best and most equipped weapons for eight years to stand in front of Iran and strike the root of resistance and destroy Iran, but they could not take a step forward.
He emphasized: What weakens people from religion is liberal thinking, not jurisprudential thinking. On the contrary, jurisprudential thinking gives hope to people, and in every scene of the world, the jurisprudential thinking has been victorious, and the secret of the jurisprudence’s success is his courage, which fearlessly stands in front of these thoughts. An example of this stand of the jurist is the stand of Sheikh Mohammad Taghi Shirazi, who swears an oath with the scholars and the people of the city and expels the British from the city; This is a jurist and the thinking of a jurist.
An example of liberal thinking
This professor of external courses at Qom seminary stated that liberal thinking has caused people to lose religion and hurt religion, and said: The liberal thinking is that the banks should not be touched and it should be the same as the western economy, students should be free in all ways in the university and even in The Islamic country should come without veil. The liberal thinking is that in the city squares and even in the holy city of Qom, women can go out however they want. It is liberal thinking that attacks religion, not the thinking of jurisprudence and clergy! If the thinking of jurisprudence stands in front of dictatorship.
He added: “This question of mine has not been resolved yet, and when we investigate, the area where we were hit was this area and this liberal thought and freedom thought that a person chanted the slogan of freedom for eight years!” Or the thought of negotiating with the West, which he chanted for eight years and shut down all the work.
Liberal thinking is an obstacle to the success of the jurist and the cause of religious conversion
He clarified: This liberal thinking does not allow the jurist to be successful, otherwise, if this individual abandons this liberal thinking and it is the same thinking of Martyr Sadr and Martyr Motahari and religious elders, people will not be converted to religion, but on the contrary, they will hope, and where this liberal thinking It fails, but it is the jurist who saves the people. Therefore, basically, the work of jurists is not the cause of the cause, but their work is to produce incentives, it is not to be themselves.
Hojjat al-Islam wa al-Muslimin Ahadi said in the end about the thought system of the Supreme Leader: It took a lot of effort for this thought system to take root, but unfortunately, recently some people are trying to bring back the same rotten thoughts that caused the Motaharis to be martyred.