Covering people is not part of privacy – Mehr News Agency | Iran and world’s news

According to the Mehr correspondent, Channel 5’s “Cheragh” program this week hosted Farzaneh Sarir, a university professor, a basic lawyer in a judiciary, the head of the Judiciary Bar Commission and a member of the Judiciary’s High Human Rights Staff with two decades of experience in this field. .

Referring to the social dimension of human existence, Sarir said: “Man is a social being and it is very clear that social interactions are also effective in human beings, in other words, they are both affected and affected, and an interactive relationship is effective.” Therefore, according to any environment, clothes should be worn in accordance with it. For example, a person cannot appear in court as a lawyer in the same attire as he or she attends a wedding. Therefore, it cannot be said that clothes and clothing are ineffective, just as the type of clothing a person creates is legally criminal or will cause psychological distress. It was a case of a woman living in a 34- or 35-unit complex, a family from the complex who had a vow. The son of the family is engaged in distributing the vows. In one of the units, he encounters the daughter of a woman who had a very inappropriate cover, and when this gentleman takes the vow bowl, a word of love happens at a glance. Therefore, because the gentleman believed in the observance of the sanctities, he shared it with his family, and the family began to investigate this young lady. Because in large complexes, neighbors do not know each other. As a result of the investigation, the family finds out that the girl’s parents are in the city and that the girl is single and lives in a single house and does not have a good record, but the boy thinks that because the girl does not have proper clothing, her family They have this opinion, so he researches himself and comes to the same conclusion, but nevertheless he raises the issue with the lady’s daughter and says that because of my interest in you, I can forgive you for everything you have done so far, but if after marriage with Keep doing this, rest assured I will kill you! Therefore, the very act of committing a crime and threat is itself a crime. This judicial effect is a cover over the actions of individuals. The work continued until the boy was on duty, and when two men entered the woman’s house, he called the 110 police, and the police arrested the girl for illegitimate relations, and the case was over. But the effect it had on the young man’s morale led him to undergo psychotherapy for a year and then be able to return to a normal life. So we can not say that our cover has no effect on others because you actually see that this has happened.

He pointed out: Certainly, non-observance of privacy is a problem. For example, there were families who were high-ranking bank employees and Mrs. Dabir. They had good qualities, such as benevolence, and helped a woman who had lost her child and her husband in an accident at work, and whose mother had died, and who lived with her father and was not in a good financial position. Although this gentleman was a man of privacy and sanctity, and every week he went to her father’s house and provided for their needs, but this lady’s behavior and clothing were such that she finally attracted the gentleman’s attention, created dependence, and finally this lady to This gentleman enters into a temporary contract. When their spouse finds out, they say that they can not live with such a man. I, as a lawyer, had to make peace in the first place because they had a 19-year-old girl and a 16-year-old boy, and they had lived together for 20 years. So when I checked, I saw that these women who are getting married temporarily have inappropriate clothing everywhere, even the protection of their workplace had been repeatedly warned. Even when this gentleman went to their house on the weekend to help, he had very, very inappropriate cover and provocative behavior, so that few could resist. I said to this gentleman, why didn’t you take this aid with your wife? Or I told the lady why you did not go with your wife, it is true that she is not benevolent, but sometimes the person himself can take a solution that does not lead to such problems. If the man has a weak role, the woman should complement his behavior. Which eventually led to a consensual divorce until the day before the court date, they called her and asked what decision was better? I suggested that they take a week off and go on a pilgrimage together and have a conversation, because they were a reliable man and they had lived together for 20 years, which, thank God, they did, and it ended well and they returned to their life together. .

“There seems to be a mismatch between the concept of being personal and privacy,” Serir said. What has nothing to do with others and no one is allowed to interfere, rape or spy on it without the permission and rule of law is privacy, not dress. According to international instruments as well as domestic law, including Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Islamic Declaration of Human Rights, all three recognize that privacy means no one has the right to dignity, housing, employment or human rights. Other correspondence and correspondence interferes illegally or spies and rapes, and the law protects the individual against these illegal interferences and rapes. So the cover is not inside privacy. In addition, we have five international conventions to which Iran has acceded: the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the Supplementary Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination in 1957. Elimination of Racial Discrimination in 1965, the Refugee Convention and its Additional Protocol of 1967, and the International Convention on the Abolition and Punishment of Apartheid Crimes of 1973. Privacy is defined in international instruments as follows; Where in these documents is it stated that the cover is part of the privacy of the people and that if I dress in any way, it does not matter to anyone. In domestic laws, in Articles 22, 25 and 39 of the Constitution, exactly the same cases that are considered in international documents, except for privacy, are considered here, and in the Islamic Penal Code, Articles 580 and 582, in the Law on Respect for Legitimate Freedoms. And citizenship coverage in paragraphs 6 and 8 refers to the fact that it again includes housing and the same items mentioned in international instruments and does not include coverage in any way. So not only is coverage nothing but privacy, but the type of coverage people have in society is also influential.

He said: “We had a case in which a woman came in a very desperate situation, where her husband was the CEO of a commercial company and they were bound and had privacy, and they also had a little girl, but the secretary of this company was a woman who did not respect privacy in any way.” Day by day, he added to the lack of observance of his cover, that is, if one day he came with a scarf, the next month he would come with a scarf, or the next month he would loosen his scarf, and this would go so far that this secretary would attract the gentleman’s attention. Of course, they were also to blame in this category, because he slipped, and whoever slips in this matter is guilty, whether intentionally or unintentionally. Unfortunately, the gentleman falls in love with this lady and marries her. So what caused a man who is also bound to slip? In the long run, not in 4 or 6 months? It took 4 years for this secretary to be able to influence this gentleman. So how can it be claimed that coverage has no effect on people’s social interactions! While the type of cover was able to break up a family. This secretary, who initially entered the company with a cover that was in line with the criteria announced by this gentleman, and gradually changed and reduced the cover and attracted attention and married this man, asked him to pay Mali in his name as well. Then, despite the fact that he had children from this man, he abandoned them and left, and when they investigate him, they realize that his profession and trick is the same deception, and that he is a person who looks for another’s property and spreads a trap with no Observance of sanctities.

Sarir said: “Or in another example, in a cultural environment, the CEO of a publishing house had a wife with 4 children. This lady came to me and said, ‘I want to get all my financial rights from my wife.’ Their wife had been so inattentive to her family for some time that I thought it was because of her busy schedule that not only did she not pay for the children’s education but also my alimony, and we were so desperate that I had to sell my gold. But after checking, I found out that my wife has an independent house and she also has a wife and children. They came to me and asked for help while they had been living with their husband for 32 years and his wife had threatened to divorce him because his children had grown up and they were all of marriageable age and they said he was divorcing her and He lives with his new wife. One day after the divorce petition, I saw this lady come and say that the man’s second wife, who had 14 dowry coins and the house was in his name, filed for divorce with full consent and admitted that he approached the man with financial intent and He even abandoned his small child and said that he did not deserve to raise him, and the man came to his first wife with tears and lamentation and expressed regret, and even their young child was raised by this lady.

In a part of his speech, the lawyer said: non-observance of privacy is a matter and is not assigned to a specific place. It may be a workplace or a hospital, a university or a home. I happened to have a case where a 21-year-old woman came to me with a young boy with a receipt stating that her client was not financially able to pay the attorney’s fee and said that she could no longer bear to live with her husband, and I found out that the boy was with her. She is his cousin, not their wife! And they said that the only person in the world who understood me was my cousin. He said my wife is skeptical and thinks I have a relationship with my cousins; I said, “Maybe you did something that made them think that, or did you not research him before marriage?” If he was a coward, why did you marry him? They said why he happens to be a polite and good person. It was only two years after their marriage that he said that my cousin’s wife also thought I was in a relationship with him. If our relationship with my aunt’s family is very good and intimate. We travel together, and… basically my cousins ​​are like my brothers. I told him do not you think the problem is you? Your spouse is from a different family and your cousin’s from a different family with a different upbringing, don’t you think it’s your problem because they both think the same about you? This lady did not have a proper cover, they had an open front coat with an inappropriate cover, and they noticed my look at the type of their clothes. In general, and in one sentence, due to the different life experiences we have in our country, non-observance of boundaries and boundaries is incorrect and problematic.

It should be mentioned that Cheragh TV program in the third season, airs on Sundays and Tuesdays around 9 pm on Channel 5 of Sima and discusses a challenge every week and holds a weekly poll.