The Court of Administrative Justice has not issued a verdict on vaccination / The verdict posted on social media is fake

Fars News Agency Legal and Judicial Department – In recent days, a ruling attributed to the Court of Administrative Justice was published on social media, according to which the imposition of restrictions on people who have not been vaccinated has been declared illegal, and it has been ruled that trade unions will not be sealed if they are not vaccinated.

Majid Bashiri, Director General of the Presidency and Public Relations of the Court of Administrative Justice, said about the validity of this verdict: “A document attributed to the Court was published in cyberspace in the form of a lawsuit, which is a forged document and no such verdict has been issued.”

He added: “Even the contents of this verdict have been clumsily falsified and the old ballot paper of the court, which was related to the building of the court six years ago, has been used, and the details of the plaintiff, the complainant and the branch issuing the verdict are not known.”

Bashiri added: So far, no lawsuit has been issued by the branches of the Administrative Justice Court in this regard.

Announcement of the Administrative Court of Justice regarding the falsification of the published verdict

The Public Relations Department of the Administrative Court of Justice also issued a statement in this regard today, emphasizing that the verdict was fake. This announcement is as follows:

“Following the publication of a picture of a lawsuit by the Court of Administrative Justice in the media and cyberspace regarding the complaint of one of the union units from the health network that it was sealed due to not presenting the vaccine card of the union unit.

According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff in his defense against vaccination stated that the current vaccines are often foreign and suspicious and do not have long-term effectiveness, and therefore refused to inject the vaccine, and finally the Court of Administrative Justice argued that vaccines Available on a trial basis and licensed for emergency use, the unit can continue to operate until the Corona Vaccine Compulsory Act is passed.

This lawsuit is not approved by the Court of Administrative Justice for the following reasons:

– The text of the verdict is not legal and all the rulings of the Administrative Court of Justice are rejected or approved on the basis of legal materials, for which there is no legal argument in this lawsuit.

– Vaccination is necessary and to achieve collective safety, all individuals should be vaccinated and the Administrative Court was one of the pioneers of vaccination for its staff.

– No complaint has been filed with the Administrative Court of Justice regarding the closure of the union due to non-presentation of the vaccine card.

– The image of the published lawsuit is old, so that the address listed at the bottom is related to the old building of the Court of Administrative Justice, while the Court of Administrative Justice has been moved to the new building for about six years and the date of the lawsuit is September of this year. .

– All the cases that can be approved or rejected, such as the name of the plaintiff, the number of the lawsuit, the case number and the name of the judge who issued the verdict, have been distorted and cannot be followed up.

“And more importantly, the branch issuing the lawsuit is the nineteenth branch, which is currently inactive and no case will be referred to it.”

End of message /

You can edit this post