The need to clarify the definition of “illegal” votes / increase in the application of Article 477 is not due to the increase of illegal votes

Mehrnoosh Abuzari, a basic lawyer and a member of the faculty of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, in an interview with a judicial reporter of Fars News Agency regarding the actions of the judiciary regarding unconstitutional rulings, said: And the parties to the case consider the application of Article 477 as one of the usual proceedings; However, this is not the case and the application of Article 477 is for exceptions.

Welcoming the view of the Judiciary Department for a solution regarding the increase of requests for the application of Article 477, the professor of the University of Tehran noted: It is necessary to clarify the mechanism contrary to Islamic law and to define it precisely.

Emphasizing the need to determine the mechanism for obtaining a violation of Islamic law and provide a clear framework for it, he said: “If this mechanism becomes regular, we will face a reduction in requests for the application of Article 477 in the future.”

Abuzari concluded by emphasizing that the increase in requests for Article 477 does not necessarily result from an increase in votes contrary to Islamic law. It is not between the Shari’a and the votes issued.

End of message /

You can edit this post